Teams

Solivita-Adams

2024 ORANGESEMINOLE Adult 55 & Over-Winter-Day · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.12 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-02-27vs Florida/Roedig/55 & Over7.0WLost 02
L#2 DoublesSally Barkley / Leslie Sanders vs Jean Jenkins / Kelly Tilghman0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTheresa Martinez / Deborah Dettmer vs Michele Hunter / Tina Bernhoft1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-02-25vs Sanlando-Crane-Kick AceLost 01
L#1 DoublesColleen Chandler / Arlene Adams vs Cynthia Rawlins / JoAnn Dierkes2-6, 4-6
2024-02-10vs Sanlando-Crane-Kick AceLost 02
L#1 DoublesDeborah Dettmer / Theresa Martinez vs Kathi Thomas / Lori Tucker7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesArlene Adams / Leslie Sanders vs Cynthia Rawlins / Amy Seelman6-7, 2-6
2024-01-28vs Florida/Roedig/55 & Over7.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesDeborah Dettmer / Theresa Martinez vs Mercedes Donaldson / Sherene Lewis2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLeslie Sanders / Arlene Adams vs Angela Tuckerman / Michele Hunter4-6, 0-6
2024-01-14vs Sanlando-Crane-Kick AceLost 02
L#1 DoublesTheresa Martinez / Leslie Sanders vs Lori Tucker / Kathi Thomas2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDeborah Dettmer / Sally Barkley vs Cynthia Rawlins / Dorothy Harris0-6, 0-6
2024-01-13vs Florida/Roedig/55 & Over7.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesTheresa Martinez / Leslie Sanders vs Lisa Miller / Jean Jenkins4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Deborah Dettmer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Colleen Chandler
published 3
2.68
Leslie Sanders
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.51
Darcy Cobb
published 3
2.34
Arlene Adams
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Arlene Adams + Leslie Sanders71443% games+5.1% vs expected
Leslie Sanders + Deborah Dettmer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deborah Dettmer
167W–205L career · 4 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Colleen Chandler
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Leslie Sanders
66W–115L career · 5 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Darcy Cobb
1W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
2.51
3
Arlene Adams
59W–121L career · 3 lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
2.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.