Teams

40 Love

2026 USTA Adult 40 & Over · Women 4.5 - 40 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 4.40 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-16vs Far-FlungWon 30
W#1 DoublesValerie Scheevel / Kelly Daniel vs Sara Williams / Paige Darden6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesStacey Ziegler / AMY BELLAMAH-DANIEL vs Taylor Erickson / Andrea Hier6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmber Sparks / Irma Spang vs Lucy France / Sherrie Fuller-Benge4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-15vs Far-FlungWon 31
W#1 DoublesMariah Mandt / Erin Chang vs Sara Williams / Paige Darden6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAmber Sparks vs Lucy France7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAMY BELLAMAH-DANIEL / Stacey Ziegler vs Andrea Hier / Taylor Erickson6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Lund / Joanne Sposito vs Melanie Mudge / Kandy Chain3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-08-07vs Far-FlungLost 12
L#1 DoublesErin Chang / Mariah Mandt vs Kandy Chain / Andrea Hier4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKelly Daniel vs Jennifer Poetzl1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAmber Sparks / Irma Spang vs Lucy France / Sherrie Fuller-Benge6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.5 - 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
AMY BELLAMAH-DANIEL
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Mariah Mandt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.15
Amber Sparks
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.13
Hannah Shirkey
published 4.5
4.10
Joanne Sposito
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Valerie Scheevel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.00
Kelly Daniel
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.99
Elizabeth Lund
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.77
Erin Chang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Irma Spang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Stacey Ziegler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joanne Sposito + Elizabeth Lund044 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Lund + Hannah Shirkey224 matchesnot enough data
Stacey Ziegler + Joanne Sposito303 matchesnot enough data
Stacey Ziegler + AMY BELLAMAH-DANIEL303 matchesnot enough data
Joanne Sposito + Hannah Shirkey213 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Daniel + Mariah Mandt123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
AMY BELLAMAH-DANIEL
46W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
4.25
Mariah Mandt
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
4.16
4.5
Amber Sparks
51W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Hannah Shirkey
42W–18L career · no lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
4.13
4.5
Joanne Sposito
63W–73L career · 1 line in 2026
24%76%<1%
4.10
Valerie Scheevel
6W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
25%75%<1%
4.09
Kelly Daniel
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
4.00
4
Elizabeth Lund
76W–48L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.99
Erin Chang
14W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.77
Irma Spang
20W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stacey Ziegler
23W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.