← Search

Elizabeth Lund

Bozeman, MT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 79W–50L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Lund to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history129 matches
L
Melanie Mudge / Kandy Chain
2026-08-15 · 40 Love · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joanne Sposito
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
Stephanie Skarwecki / Crista Gilmore
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Maria Staszcuk championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
Ava Nhaisi / Dawn Farber
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Joanne Sposito championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-26 · 406 Love · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Mudge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-25 · 406 Love · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Waters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-24 · 406 Love · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danielle Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-05 · Slice Syndicate · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joanne Sposito
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-04 · Slice Syndicate · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joanne Sposito
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-03 · Slice Syndicate · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Maria Staszcuk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-01 · Bozeman 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Luke Sodolak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
Jennifer Poetzl / Daniel Plowman
2026-03-01 · Bozeman 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Luke Sodolak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-01 · Bozone · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Zach Lubek mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 63% of games
4.0
85.3%
29W–5L · 64.9% of games
4.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 50.7% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
52.6%
10W–9L · 52.9% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
64 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
18 matches
#1 Singles
9%
12 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams