Teams

406 Love

2026 USTA Adult 40 & Over · Women 4.0 - 40 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-26vs Glacier GritWon 40
W#1 DoublesAnn Waters / Danielle Smith vs Sara Hemmer / Caroline Bennett7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJennifer Poetzl vs Katelyn Monday6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMelanie Mudge / Elizabeth Lund vs Jennie Brawn / Tricia Alexander6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTraci Huber / Lisa Brown vs Melissa Haigh / Anne Oehlerich6-1, 7-5
2026-07-25vs Mid-Court CrisisWon 40
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Lund / Ann Waters vs Shelly Jensen / Sherrie Harris6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJennifer Poetzl vs Susan Litherland6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMelanie Mudge / Danielle Smith vs Sarah Miller / Gatchina Hessler6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSarah Bach / Lisa Brown vs Elizabeth Suh / Margaret Moffatt6-0, 6-1
2026-07-25vs Glacier GritWon 40
W#1 DoublesMelanie Mudge / Ann Waters vs Sara Hemmer / Tricia Alexander6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLisa Brown vs Anne Oehlerich6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTraci Huber / Sarah Bach vs Jennie Brawn / Courtney Torgerson6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnna Collins / Cassie Springer vs Katelyn Monday / Caroline Bennett6-0, 6-2
2026-07-24vs Mid-Court CrisisWon 40
W#1 DoublesDanielle Smith / Elizabeth Lund vs Kimimi Ashley / Sherrie Harris6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCassie Springer vs Susan Litherland7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJennifer Poetzl / Traci Huber vs Shelly Jensen / Margaret Moffatt6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAnna Collins / Ann Waters vs Elizabeth Suh / Nancy Trangmoe6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Women 4.0 - 40 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1406 Love40160183

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Jennifer Poetzl
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.99
Elizabeth Lund
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.98
Ann Waters
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.92
Lisa Brown
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.88
Sarah Bach
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.86
Melanie Mudge
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.83
Traci Huber
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Danielle Smith
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Cassie Springer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Anna Collins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Smith + Melanie Mudge5260% games+8.5% vs expected
Elizabeth Lund + Melanie Mudge5164% games+7.9% vs expected
Danielle Smith + Elizabeth Lund8258% games−6.3% vs expected
Danielle Smith + Sarah Bach2441% gamesnot enough data
Anna Collins + Cassie Springer1440% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jennifer Poetzl
33W–21L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
4.05
4
Elizabeth Lund
76W–48L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.99
4
Ann Waters
25W–15L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Lisa Brown
8W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.92
4
Sarah Bach
59W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.88
4
Melanie Mudge
36W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Traci Huber
44W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Danielle Smith
59W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Cassie Springer
25W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Anna Collins
20W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.