← Search

Sarah Bach

Billings, MT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
113 matches · 59W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sarah Bach to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history113 matches
W
2026-07-25 · 406 Love · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Traci Huber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · 406 Love · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
Nicolas Rioja / Mae Alexander
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Josh Stimac championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
Sean Amberg / Nicole Reyes
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Josh Stimac championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Josh Stimac championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-03-01 · Demaray · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Josh Stimac mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-02-28 · Demaray · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Josh Stimac mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-02-28 · Demaray · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Josh Stimac mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-02-27 · Demaray · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Josh Stimac mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
L
2025-08-04 · 40 4.5 Q Team · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paige Darden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-08-03 · 40 4.5 Q Team · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tessa Jochim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-08-01 · 40 4.5 Q Team · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paige Darden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 52.1% of games
4.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 40.4% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 52.6% of games
8.0mixed
72.7%
16W–6L · 54.9% of games
8.5mixed
100%
9W–0L · 63.4% of games
9.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 60.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
34 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal