Teams

Demaray

2026 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER · 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-01vs Bozeman 8.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesHazel Demaray / Ryan Schreiber vs Brandon Moore / Joanne Sposito6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSarah Bach / Josh Stimac vs Melanie Mudge / John Reenan6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJennifer Poetzl / Daniel Plowman vs Elizabeth Lund / Luke Sodolak6-4, 7-5
2026-02-28vs Billings 8.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesHazel Demaray / Ryan Schreiber vs Anna Collins / Ray Loomis6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Bach / Josh Stimac vs Lisa Brown / Enrique Osorio7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJennifer Poetzl / Daniel Plowman vs Camilla McCullough / David Gard6-1, 6-2
2026-02-28vs Bozeman 8.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesHazel Demaray / Ryan Schreiber vs Brandon Moore / Kari Keogh6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Bach / Josh Stimac vs Elizabeth Lund / Luke Sodolak6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBecky Abrams / Jimmy Vroman vs John Reenan / Melanie Mudge4-6, 3-6
2026-02-27vs Billings 8.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Bach / Josh Stimac vs Lisa Brown / Enrique Osorio7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Poetzl / Daniel Plowman vs Camilla McCullough / David Gard6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBecky Abrams / Jimmy Vroman vs Anna Collins / Ray Loomis7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Demaray40111373
2Bozeman 8.0225715111
3Billings 8.00421022141

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Jennifer Poetzl
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.89
Sarah Bach
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.85
Daniel Plowman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Josh Stimac
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Ryan Schreiber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Jimmy Vroman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Becky Abrams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Hazel Demaray
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hazel Demaray + Ryan Schreiber10170% gamesnot enough data
Josh Stimac + Sarah Bach404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jennifer Poetzl
33W–21L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
4.05
4
Sarah Bach
59W–54L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Daniel Plowman
31W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Josh Stimac
6W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Ryan Schreiber
14W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Jimmy Vroman
22W–56L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Becky Abrams
4W–5L career · type M · 2 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.50
0
Hazel Demaray
15W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.