Teams

Billings 8.0

2026 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER · 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-01vs Bozeman 8.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Brown / Enrique Osorio vs Joanne Sposito / Paul Cross0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnna Collins / Ray Loomis vs John Reenan / Melanie Mudge6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJoy He / Sam van Roy vs Luke Sodolak / Elizabeth Lund1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-28vs Bozeman 8.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJoy He / Sam van Roy vs Kari Keogh / Brandon Moore5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAnna Collins / Ray Loomis vs Melanie Mudge / Luke Sodolak3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCamilla McCullough / David Gard vs Elizabeth Lund / Paul Cross2-6, 1-6
2026-02-28vs DemarayLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnna Collins / Ray Loomis vs Hazel Demaray / Ryan Schreiber2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Brown / Enrique Osorio vs Sarah Bach / Josh Stimac5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCamilla McCullough / David Gard vs Jennifer Poetzl / Daniel Plowman1-6, 2-6
2026-02-27vs DemarayLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Brown / Enrique Osorio vs Sarah Bach / Josh Stimac5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCamilla McCullough / David Gard vs Jennifer Poetzl / Daniel Plowman0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAnna Collins / Ray Loomis vs Becky Abrams / Jimmy Vroman7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Demaray40111373
2Bozeman 8.0225715111
3Billings 8.00421022141

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Lisa Brown
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
David Gard
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Anna Collins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.21
Camilla McCullough
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Enrique Osorio
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Joy He
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Ray Loomis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Sam van Roy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anna Collins + Ray Loomis5544% gamesnot enough data
Enrique Osorio + Lisa Brown033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lisa Brown
8W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.92
4
David Gard
0W–8L career · type M · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Anna Collins
20W–38L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Camilla McCullough
3W–10L career · type T · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Enrique Osorio
5W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Joy He
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ray Loomis
11W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sam van Roy
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.