← Search

Melanie Mudge

Bozeman, MT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 52W–18L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Melanie Mudge to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
W
2026-08-15 · Far-Flung · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kandy Chain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-26 · 406 Love · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Lund
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-25 · 406 Love · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Waters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Sarah Miller / Gatchina Hessler
2026-07-25 · 406 Love · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danielle Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-03-01 · Bozeman 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Reenan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-03-01 · Bozeman 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Reenan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-02-28 · Bozeman 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Reenan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-02-28 · Bozeman 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Luke Sodolak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Betsy Pettet / Christa Casper
2025-11-15 · #2 Doubles · with Hannah Shirkey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-11-15 · #2 Doubles · with Elizabeth Lund championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
Diane McGee / Jennifer Mei
2025-11-14 · #2 Doubles · with Elizabeth Lund championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Judy Spasser / Nancy Zeigel
2025-11-14 · #2 Doubles · with Hannah Shirkey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
87.9%
29W–4L · 61.8% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 48.7% of games
8.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 51% of the time
#2 Doubles
51%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
14 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams