← Search

Danielle Smith

Bozeman, MT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
109 matches · 59W–50L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Danielle Smith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history109 matches
W
2026-07-26 · 406 Love · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Waters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
Sarah Miller / Gatchina Hessler
2026-07-25 · 406 Love · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Mudge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-24 · 406 Love · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Lund
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
Wendy Brady / Margot Bloom
2025-10-18 · #3 Doubles · with Michelle Grocke championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-10-18 · #3 Doubles · with Michelle Grocke championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
Linda Myres / Joan Eicher
2025-10-17 · #2 Doubles · with Elizabeth Lund championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
Susan Lapetina / Allyson McMahon
2025-10-17 · #2 Doubles · with Elizabeth Lund championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-10-11 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
Emily Collins / Crystal Graves
2025-10-11 · #2 Doubles · with Elizabeth Lund championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
Anna Porcelli / Kristin Main
2025-10-10 · #3 Doubles · with Melanie Mudge championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2025-10-10 · #1 Doubles · with Elizabeth Lund championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
Susan Koelliker / Katie Zimmerman
2025-09-06 · #1 Doubles · with Elizabeth Lund championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
95.5%
21W–1L · 70.1% of games
4.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 35.4% of games
7.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 54.5% of games
8.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 49.2% of games
9.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 47.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
28 matches
#1 Singles
8%
9 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer