Teams

40 4.5 Q Team

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over · Women 4.5 - 40 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 4.30 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-04vs Montana/Ziegler/40&OverLost 13
L#1 DoublesSarah Bach / Paige Darden vs Becky King / Mary Ritchie4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSherrie Fuller-Benge vs AMY BELLAMAH-DANIEL3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAnn Waters / Kandy Chain vs Andrea Hier / Stacey Ziegler6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMary McNulty / Marrian Fujinami vs Catherine Pfarrer / Katherine Olivier4-6, 2-6
2025-08-03vs Montana/Ziegler/40&OverLost 13
L#1 DoublesSarah Bach / Tessa Jochim vs Becky King / Mary Ritchie3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesPaige Darden vs Amber Sparks2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLauren Peck / Hannah Shirkey vs Elizabeth Lund / Andrea Hier6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesIrma Spang / Sherrie Fuller-Benge vs Morgan Daley / AMY BELLAMAH-DANIEL1-6, 2-6
2025-08-01Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSarah Bach / Paige Darden vs Amber Sparks / Mary Ritchie4-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesTessa Jochim vs Becky King2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSara Aldinger / Kandy Chain vs Andrea Hier / Elizabeth Lund6-7, 2-6
2025-07-16vs Montana/Ziegler/40&OverLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarrian Fujinami / Mary McNulty vs Catherine Pfarrer / Katherine Olivier2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAnn Waters / Hannah Shirkey vs Elizabeth Lund / Stacey Ziegler6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesIrma Spang / Sherrie Fuller-Benge vs AMY BELLAMAH-DANIEL / Morgan Daley3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 4.5 - 40 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Montana/Ziegler/40&Over401249118
240 4.5 Q Team0441225175

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Marrian Fujinami
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Lauren Peck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.13
Hannah Shirkey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.98
Ann Waters
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
Sarah Bach
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Sherrie Fuller-Benge
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.79
Mary McNulty
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Irma Spang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Paige Darden
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Paula Thomson
published
Sara Aldinger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tessa Jochim
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marrian Fujinami + Mary McNulty134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Marrian Fujinami
52W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Lauren Peck
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Hannah Shirkey
42W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
4.13
4
Ann Waters
25W–15L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Sarah Bach
59W–54L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.88
Sherrie Fuller-Benge
19W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%88%12%
3.83
Mary McNulty
160W–99L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
Irma Spang
20W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paige Darden
22W–40L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paula Thomson
14W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Aldinger
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tessa Jochim
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.