Teams

Bozone

2026 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER · 9.0 Mixed 18 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 4.30 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-01vs 406Split 11
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Lund / Zach Lubek vs Bob Huppert / Erica Kain0-3
W#2 DoublesMaria Staszcuk / Johncarl Rogge vs Mary Ritchie / Aaron Huber6-4, 6-4
2026-02-28vs 406Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJoshua Marine / Joanne Sposito vs Stephen Gruener / Emma Larson1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKari Keogh / Johncarl Rogge vs Navin Marimuthu / Traci Huber1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesZach Lubek / Maria Staszcuk vs Becky King / Aaron Huber6-3, 6-2
2026-02-28vs 406Lost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Lund / Zach Lubek vs Bob Huppert / Erica Kain6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoshua Marine / Maria Staszcuk vs Aaron Huber / Emma Larson2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJoanne Sposito / Johncarl Rogge vs Nicholas Scott / Traci Huber6-7, 1-6
2026-02-27vs 406Lost 12
L#1 DoublesZach Lubek / Maria Staszcuk vs Traci Huber / Nicholas Scott4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKari Keogh / Johncarl Rogge vs Navin Marimuthu / Erica Kain3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJoshua Marine / Joanne Sposito vs Aaron Huber / Mary Ritchie6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0 Mixed 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Chaotic Neutral000000
2Bozone043918130

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Joanne Sposito
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.30
Johncarl Rogge
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.25
Kari Keogh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.99
Elizabeth Lund
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.95
Maria Staszcuk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Joey Staszcuk
published
Joshua Marine
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Zach Lubek
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Staszcuk + Joey Staszcuk033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Joanne Sposito
63W–73L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Johncarl Rogge
36W–49L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Kari Keogh
33W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
4.25
4
Elizabeth Lund
78W–50L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.99
4
Maria Staszcuk
24W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.95
Joey Staszcuk
4W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Joshua Marine
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Zach Lubek
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.