Teams

BRMST NAVY

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-29vs CVTA ORANGEWon 10
W#1 DoublesDewey Remington / Dennis Cave vs Gary McBride / Marc Hafner5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-19vs NJ GREYLost 01
L#2 DoublesDewey Remington / Kish Dill vs Justin Birchler / Todd Hurt5-7, 2-6
2025-05-12vs BRMST REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesDewey Remington / Mike Huber vs David Manley / Mark Noonan6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-05-05vs TTA BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Kukafka / Dewey Remington vs Joshua Alexander / Carlos Yvellez6-1, 6-4
2025-04-28vs MEA REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesDewey Remington / Daniel Gracey vs Patrick Wallace / Jeff Mullikin5-7, 4-6
2025-04-14vs NJ GREYLost 01
L#1 DoublesDaniel Gracey / Dewey Remington vs Jack Center / Paul Rose0-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Dewey Remington
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Ryan Kucera
published
2.80
Kish Dill
published
David Kukafka
published 3
2.75
Dennis Cave
published 3
2.73
Paul Kucera
published
2.69
Daniel Gracey
published 3
2.59
Mike Huber
published
Doug Prom
published
Rusty Gardner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dennis Cave + Rusty Gardner2346% games+0.9% vs expected
Paul Kucera + Ryan Kucera4350% games−7.6% vs expected
Dennis Cave + Daniel Gracey3253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dewey Remington
65W–63L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.92
Ryan Kucera
17W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Kish Dill
13W–12L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
3
David Kukafka
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Dennis Cave
18W–31L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Paul Kucera
7W–15L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Daniel Gracey
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Mike Huber
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.59
Doug Prom
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rusty Gardner
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.