Teams

TOC.Steet

2024 CTRL Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-18vs TING.ByrdLost 01
L#1 DoublesEric Schraibman / John Nealis vs Christopher MacK / Vinicio Haro6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-07-12vs TOC.SalianSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCharles Gordon / Joseph Swoager vs Kapil Dukle / Sushrut Bhowmik6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRichard Anderson / Taylor VICK vs Ajit Shankardas / Debashish Pal1-6, 3-6
2024-07-01vs LOCH.GloerLost 01
L#1 DoublesCharles Gordon / Joseph Swoager vs Jeff Estroff / Pedro Torrejon3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-06-27vs TOC.PuriWon 10
W#1 DoublesCharles Gordon / Joseph Swoager vs Sanjay Ambardar / Nishant Puri7-5, 7-5
2024-06-17vs TOC.HariharanLost 01
L#1 DoublesRichard Anderson / Daniel McDonald vs Praveen Krishnamurthy / Srinivas Govindaraju0-6, 1-6
2024-05-30vs PW.RoussinWon 10
W#1 DoublesEric Schraibman / Richard Anderson vs Mark Heron / Michael Lipkin6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2024-05-23vs TOC.SpiningLost 01
L#2 DoublesThomas Steet / Richard Anderson vs Mark Spining / Balaji Radhakrishnan4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Eric Schraibman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Joseph Swoager
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
John Nealis
published
3.48
Charles Gordon
published 3.5
3.35
Taylor VICK
published
3.33
Richard Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
John Fearrington
published
3.12
Grayson Hale
published
3.11
Thomas Steet
published
2.98
Scott Daniel
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Eric Schraibman
64W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.84
4
Joseph Swoager
53W–24L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
John Nealis
14W–18L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
3.5
Charles Gordon
16W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
Taylor VICK
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Richard Anderson
36W–26L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
John Fearrington
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%3%97%
3.26
Grayson Hale
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.12
Thomas Steet
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
Scott Daniel
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.