Teams

STSC-Hatley

2023 ADULT 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-11-20vs STSC-ChamberlainWon 21
L#1 DoublesJoyce Nelson / Dawn Vlahandreas vs Alejandra Clemens / Shannan Murphy-Barlow4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDeb Meyers / Susan Humphrey vs Connie Peters / Cristina Ford5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnnette Hatley / Lisa Reid vs Nancy Chamberlain / Stephenie Tucker6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-11-13vs ESTC-ThompsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoyce Nelson / Nancy Bashey vs Paula Williams / Laurie Leece6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCheri Wulf / Gloria Flager vs Amanda Jordan / Rhonda McBride6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAnnette Hatley / Lisa Reid vs Diane Musgrove / Karen Bodeen5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2022-11-05vs ESTC-EnosWon 21
L#1 DoublesCatherine Shuttleworth / Krystal Palmer vs Susan Burgess / Wendy Gildea1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJoyce Nelson / Nancy Bashey vs Marlene Enos / Julie Duvall6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTina Rogers / Suzi Cote vs Anita Geisler / Radona Peterson6-4, 6-3
2022-10-30vs TTC-IgarashiLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnnette Hatley / Lisa Reid vs Donna Keim / Patti Youngren1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesGloria Flager / Nancy Bashey vs Heidi Igarashi / Tammy Skubinna6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSusan Humphrey / Deb Meyers vs Lisa Adamczyk / Melissa Pohl2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-10-23vs S OR-EYMCA-BascomLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarol Hoffos / Mari Bailey vs Raquel Hecht / Sharon Markham4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSuzi Cote / Tina Rogers vs Xiaotong Wang / Katherine Gibbs1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine Shuttleworth / Nancy Bashey vs Staci Schipporeit / MARIKO HALL3-6, 4-6
2022-10-01vs ACB-Lobbin' LadiesWon 21
W#1 DoublesCatherine Shuttleworth / Krystal Palmer vs ILima Furey / Melanie Ditton6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGloria Flager / Cheri Wulf vs Ann Francois / Katie Phelps3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Bashey / Dawn Vlahandreas vs Jolene Neal / Susan Myers6-2, 7-5
2022-09-25vs ACB-Sweet ShotsWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnnette Hatley / Lisa Reid vs Katy Rocher / Linda White6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCarol Hoffos / Joyce Nelson vs Michelle McAuliffe / Jamie Hoesly6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSusan Humphrey / Catherine Shuttleworth vs Jill Huffman / Cathy Geiger6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Carol Hoffos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Gloria Flager
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Catherine Shuttleworth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Cheri Wulf
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Lisa Reid
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Susan Humphrey
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.03
Dawn Vlahandreas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.90
Annette Hatley
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
Joyce Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Krystal Palmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Bashey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Suzi Cote
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Tina Rogers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gloria Flager + Nancy Bashey9463% games+10.5% vs expected
Cheri Wulf + Gloria Flager251358% games+1.7% vs expected
Susan Humphrey + Annette Hatley341758% games−4.0% vs expected
Carol Hoffos + Gloria Flager11556% gamesnot enough data
Joyce Nelson + Carol Hoffos8164% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Reid + Annette Hatley2644% gamesnot enough data
Joyce Nelson + Lisa Reid3254% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Reid + Gloria Flager3258% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carol Hoffos
53W–37L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%79%20%
3.38
3.5
Gloria Flager
104W–53L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Catherine Shuttleworth
5W–8L career · type S · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Cheri Wulf
64W–59L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Lisa Reid
64W–53L career · 4 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Susan Humphrey
71W–37L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.04
3.5
Dawn Vlahandreas
10W–22L career · 2 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Annette Hatley
88W–67L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.90
Joyce Nelson
20W–10L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Krystal Palmer
7W–12L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Bashey
42W–35L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Suzi Cote
14W–31L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tina Rogers
6W–20L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.