Teams

TTC-Igarashi

2023 ADULT 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-11-20vs ESTC-ThompsonLost 12
W#1 DoublesChristine Mueller / Donna Jepsen Minyard vs Paula Thompson / Deborah Kingsley4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDianne Tanselli / Melissa Pohl vs Diane Musgrove / Karen Bodeen6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKathleen McBride / Catherine Frischmann vs Paula Williams / Tori Waples4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-11-19vs ESTC-EnosWon 21
L#1 DoublesDianne Tanselli / Heidi Igarashi vs Terra Sieberman / Jody Rolnick0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Adamczyk / Melissa Pohl vs Evangeline Laurie / Radona Peterson6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCatherine Frischmann / Kathleen McBride vs Marlene Enos / Wendy Laing4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-11-06vs ACB-Sweet ShotsWon 30
W#1 DoublesJane Brass Barth / Christine Mueller vs Kathryn Sanders / Julianne Wimberly6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDonna Jepsen Minyard / Catherine Frischmann vs Jamie Hoesly / Leslie Hofferd6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTammy Skubinna / Heidi Igarashi vs Linda White / Jill Huffman4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-11-05vs STSC-ChamberlainLost 12
L#1 DoublesDianne Tanselli / Sharon Kerrisk vs Stephenie Tucker / Maggie Hudson2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDonna Keim / Patti Youngren vs Catherine Wheeler / Cristina Ford3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJane Brass Barth / Christine Mueller vs Kathy Stahl / Jodi Berg6-2, 6-3
2022-10-30vs STSC-HatleyWon 21
W#1 DoublesDonna Keim / Patti Youngren vs Annette Hatley / Lisa Reid6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesHeidi Igarashi / Tammy Skubinna vs Gloria Flager / Nancy Bashey1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Adamczyk / Melissa Pohl vs Susan Humphrey / Deb Meyers6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2022-10-22vs S OR-EYMCA-BascomLost 12
L#1 DoublesDonna Keim / Patti Youngren vs Raquel Hecht / Sharon Markham3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCatherine Frischmann / Donna Jepsen Minyard vs Katherine Gibbs / Xiaotong Wang3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesHeidi Igarashi / Tammy Skubinna vs Staci Schipporeit / Janine Bryant6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2022-09-25vs ACB-Lobbin' LadiesWon 30
W#1 DoublesDonna Keim / Patti Youngren vs Katie Phelps / Melinda Lilley6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJane Brass Barth / Christine Mueller vs Ann Francois / Jolene Neal6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Adamczyk / Melissa Pohl vs ILima Furey / Lindi Dewolf5-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Donna Jepsen Minyard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Melissa Pohl
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Christine Mueller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Lisa Adamczyk
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Dianne Tanselli
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Donna Keim
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Heidi Igarashi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Jane Brass Barth
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kathleen McBride
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Patti Youngren
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Tammy Skubinna
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Igarashi + Tammy Skubinna221154% games−1.6% vs expected
Christine Mueller + Donna Jepsen Minyard91946% games−2.6% vs expected
Melissa Pohl + Lisa Adamczyk91150% games−3.0% vs expected
Melissa Pohl + Christine Mueller2542% games−4.8% vs expected
Donna Keim + Patti Youngren16762% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Pohl + Heidi Igarashi5552% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Adamczyk + Jane Brass Barth6158% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Pohl + Dianne Tanselli2450% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Donna Jepsen Minyard
35W–62L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Melissa Pohl
55W–108L career · 6 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Christine Mueller
55W–67L career · 4 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Lisa Adamczyk
23W–20L career · 3 lines in 2023
34%65%<1%
3.06
3.5
Dianne Tanselli
18W–68L career · 3 lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.05
Donna Keim
61W–38L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Heidi Igarashi
42W–42L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jane Brass Barth
42W–37L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathleen McBride
16W–31L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Patti Youngren
29W–30L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tammy Skubinna
56W–55L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.