Teams

Vendegna

2021 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

2 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carly Vendegna
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Leah Buxman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Results6 ties
2021-08-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesLeah Buxman / Carly Vendegna vs Susan Hope / Kathy Rogers3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-08-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesKacie Wise / Leah Buxman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-08-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesLeah Buxman / KEELEY PLOMBON vs Deanna McKay / Jennifer Woodard6-3, 6-2
2021-07-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesLeah Buxman / Kacie Wise vs Sheri Schipporeit / Diane Macdonald6-1, 6-3
2021-07-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesCarly Vendegna / Kacie Wise vs Reiko Maeda / Dar Dragoon6-3, 6-3
2021-06-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKEELEY PLOMBON / Carly Vendegna vs Cate Harrington / Kalynn Belden3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Carly Vendegna
67W–44L career
not enough data
4
Leah Buxman
113W–106L career
23%77%0%
3.54

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.