Teams

Salt Lake Tennis-Bayna

2022 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.0W PM

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-06-02Won 10
W#2 SinglesHatty Ostrowski vs Nancy Miller6-1, 6-4
2022-05-07vs Sports Mall-Stroud-PetersonLost 01
L#2 DoublesMariya Coleman / Mary Jayne Child vs Whitney Beard / Chelsea Spencer2-6, 2-6
2022-04-30Split 11
L#1 DoublesDonna Roach / Mariya Coleman vs Pallavi Darbhamulla / Kalaiselvi Seetharaman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesHatty Ostrowski vs Enguun Narangerel6-0, 6-0
2022-04-20Lost 01
L#2 SinglesAngela Spencer vs Stephanie Knight0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesMariya Coleman / Donna Roach vs Krissie Summerhays / Shelly Logue1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Jaime Vance
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.70
Emilee Hurley
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4
Hatty Ostrowski
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Carolyn Cottle
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 8% · published 3.5
3.06
Alison Pearce
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 3.5
2.65
Delia Bayna
usually #3 Doubles 35%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.63
Ashley Wright
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.62
Mariya Coleman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Angela Spencer
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Jan Watts
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mary Jayne Child
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Michelle Waters
published
Nooshin Prasthofer
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Delia Bayna + Carolyn Cottle4449% games+5.4% vs expected
Jan Watts + Carolyn Cottle4153% games+0.5% vs expected
Delia Bayna + Jaime Vance314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jaime Vance
176W–62L career · 17 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Emilee Hurley
96W–51L career · 11 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.70
3.5
Hatty Ostrowski
12W–14L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Carolyn Cottle
113W–130L career · 12 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Alison Pearce
171W–202L career · 14 lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
3.06
3
Delia Bayna
204W–265L career · 17 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Ashley Wright
53W–112L career · 9 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
2.63
Mariya Coleman
14W–25L career · 3 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
2.62
2.5
Angela Spencer
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Jan Watts
15W–53L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Jayne Child
50W–107L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Waters
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nooshin Prasthofer
97W–124L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.