Teams

FOSTER CITY TC/EDGEWATER PK 55MX7.0A

2025 MIXED 55&Over · 55&Over MX7.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-22vs PENINSULA TC 55MX7.0BWon 10
W#2 DoublesJunko Tanaka / Carlos Penaflorida Jr vs Audrey Tse / Tom Treanor6-1, 6-3
2025-09-06vs PENINSULA TC 55MX7.0BWon 10
W#3 DoublesMariko Kimura / Peter Watkins vs Alyssa Mccoy / Larry Laks1-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Richard Chang
published
3.76
Wendy Gee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Elaine Ikeda
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Betty Lee
published 4
3.50
Huan Ta
published
3.50
Carlos Penaflorida Jr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Stephanie Finley
published
3.36
Junko Tanaka
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Charlene Wing Wo
published 3.5
3.15
Ludwig Lin
published
3.06
Peter Watkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Dennis Louie
published 3
2.76
Theresa Menard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Jane Sison
published
Elbridges Enriquez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Gerry Sadang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Phil Medina
published
Rick Albar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gerry Sadang + Theresa Menard213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Richard Chang
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
3.86
Wendy Gee
19W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
Elaine Ikeda
17W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Betty Lee
18W–26L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Huan Ta
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Carlos Penaflorida Jr
10W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
Stephanie Finley
16W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
Junko Tanaka
28W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Charlene Wing Wo
14W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Ludwig Lin
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Peter Watkins
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
34%65%<1%
3.06
3
Dennis Louie
31W–9L career · type A · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
Theresa Menard
16W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Jane Sison
9W–16L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Elbridges Enriquez
12W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Gerry Sadang
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Phil Medina
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rick Albar
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.