Teams

SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC 18AW4.0A

2022 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.0

22 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Chika Horie
published 4.5
4.36
Daniella Holm
published 4.5
3.99
3.90
Junko Ohoka
published
3.85
Beatrice Gauthe
published 4
3.82
Ilana Volfin
published 4.5
3.81
Catherine Puzon
published 4
3.80
Lori Cruz-Spray
published
3.78
Kristina Weaver
published
3.71
Ameeta Mukherjee
published 4
3.70
Sophia Fujioka
published
3.68
Elena Rishes
published 4
3.66
Ellen Gazen
published 4
3.65
Eleni Baxter
published 4
3.65
Isabelle Fateh
published 4
3.65
Chen Xiao
published 4.5
3.61
Emi Iizuka
published 3.5
3.56
Wanda Soon
published
3.56
Janet Oshiro
published
3.48
Nina Tsuneda
published
Shaun Baoerjiin
published
Zeinab Ebadat
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sophia Fujioka + Isabelle Fateh5253% games+4.4% vs expected
Ellen Gazen + Junko Ohoka404 matchesnot enough data
Lori Cruz-Spray + Junko Ohoka033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chika Horie
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
4.48
4.5
Daniella Holm
26W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
4.36
4
Babette van Antwerpen
21W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.99
Junko Ohoka
16W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Beatrice Gauthe
13W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
4.5
Ilana Volfin
11W–8L career · no lines in 2022
91%9%<1%
3.82
4
Catherine Puzon
23W–19L career · type A · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Lori Cruz-Spray
20W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Kristina Weaver
12W–10L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Ameeta Mukherjee
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
Sophia Fujioka
21W–11L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Elena Rishes
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Ellen Gazen
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Eleni Baxter
13W–13L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Isabelle Fateh
14W–16L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.65
4.5
Chen Xiao
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.65
3.5
Emi Iizuka
10W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%20%80%
3.61
Wanda Soon
0W–9L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.56
Janet Oshiro
12W–11L career · no lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
3.56
Nina Tsuneda
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.48
Shaun Baoerjiin
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Zeinab Ebadat
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.