Teams

UPTA18A/Gunderson/Pavilion

2025 UPTA Adult 18 & Over - USTA · 18+ Adult Women - 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.08 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesCatie Kelley / Joanne Cruickshank vs Ashley Brown / Riley Smith6-7, 6-7
W#1 SinglesLeigh Wolke vs Anne Taaffe6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPatricia Surles / Elizabeth Raduns vs Brittany McKenzie / Susan Tomforde6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesBrie Soler vs Catherine Boetsch1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesEmily Gunderson / Dorelly Herford vs Bobbi Bateman / Karen Tomforde6-0, 6-1
2025-03-28vs UPTA18A/Samuel-Posta/SouthsideWon 50
W#1 DoublesPatricia Surles / Elizabeth Raduns vs Cara Morris / Gloria Bleasdale6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesLeigh Wolke vs Kristen Benton6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCatie Kelley / Amanda King vs Eunice Samuel / Madina Cauthen6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesBrie Soler vs Katy Davidson6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesEmily Gunderson / Dorelly Herford vs Rachael Cariveau / Teresa Fox6-1, 6-4
2025-03-14vs UPTA18A/Zeimetz/PavilionWon 32
W#1 DoublesLora Pfohl / Elizabeth Raduns vs Ashley Rehn / Shellie Corley6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesBrie Soler vs Virginia Brannon1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJoanne Cruickshank / Patricia Surles vs Blair Zeimetz / Cady Johnson6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLeigh Wolke vs Keeley Mezzancello6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDorelly Herford / Jordan Wise vs Deb Dujardin / Dell Pulliam2-6, 0-6
2025-03-07vs UPTA18A/Blum/GCCWon 31
L#1 DoublesJordan Wise / Brenda Jones vs Kristen Patel / Shely Landrum2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJoanne Cruickshank / Elizabeth Raduns vs Susanne Norwood / Katherine Mattice6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLeigh Wolke vs Kelley Norris6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDorelly Herford / Patricia Surles vs Lindsay Norris / Reid Tollison6-2, 6-3
2025-02-21vs UPTA18A/Knight/HollyTreeWon 50
W#1 DoublesCatie Kelley / Amanda King vs Claudia Kornaros / Lora Henderson6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesBrie Soler vs Corinne Nickell2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEmily Gunderson / Dorelly Herford vs Lara Knight / Alicia Walters6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Raduns vs Tabitha Taylor6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPatricia Surles / Joanne Cruickshank vs Arden Foster / Ann Brodie6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Adult Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Leigh Wolke
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.43
Elizabeth Raduns
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.42
Patricia Surles
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.13
Emily Gunderson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.08
Catie Kelley
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
3.05
Brie Soler
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
3.02
Jordan Wise
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Dorelly Herford
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.81
Joanne Cruickshank
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.79
Gina Pelino
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.69
Mary Sansbury
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.69
Tammy Rodgers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Lora Pfohl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.19
Maryn Canniff
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joanne Cruickshank + Patricia Surles6267% games+5.3% vs expected
Dorelly Herford + Patricia Surles3260% games+4.9% vs expected
Patricia Surles + Elizabeth Raduns9063% games+3.3% vs expected
Emily Gunderson + Dorelly Herford15956% games+0.8% vs expected
Lora Pfohl + Mary Sansbury2541% games−1.5% vs expected
Dorelly Herford + Brie Soler1431% games−8.6% vs expected
Joanne Cruickshank + Mary Sansbury2349% gamesnot enough data
Gina Pelino + Joanne Cruickshank224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leigh Wolke
41W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Elizabeth Raduns
54W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.43
Patricia Surles
63W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3
Emily Gunderson
39W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.13
3
Catie Kelley
26W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.08
3
Brie Soler
31W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
Jordan Wise
23W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Dorelly Herford
33W–35L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
Joanne Cruickshank
17W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Gina Pelino
38W–52L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79
Mary Sansbury
30W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
Tammy Rodgers
7W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
Lora Pfohl
10W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.65
Maryn Canniff
24W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.