Teams

UPTA18A/Blum/GCC

2025 UPTA Adult 18 & Over - USTA · 18+ Adult Women - 3.0

24 players · average NTRP 3.19 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-18vs UPTA18A/Zeimetz/PavilionWon 32
W#1 DoublesKristen Patel / Shely Landrum vs Sandy Shaw / Sandy Buol6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesVal Kahler vs Virginia Brannon1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBetsy Norwood / Joanna Bragdon vs Brandi Bradbrook / Ashley Rehn6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesKatie Culumovic vs Shellie Corley1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesHanna Lane / Catherine Webb vs Cady Johnson / Bronwen Greene6-2, 6-4
2025-04-11vs UPTA18A/Ruggiero/Hwy14Won 41
W#1 DoublesJoanna Bragdon / Erin Piepkow vs Angie Hill / Cindy Hradec4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesWhitney Blum vs Sherri Daniel6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesReid Tollison / Kristen Patel vs Crystal Rogers / Tracy Chastain6-1, 7-5
W#2 SinglesKatie Culumovic vs Tracey MacDonald6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesVal Kahler / Marquin Campbell vs Rebecca Foss / Abby Warren6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-03-28vs UPTA18A/Kimbell/ThornbladeWon 40
W#1 DoublesAnn Ellison / Sherwood Cobb vs Karen Golden / Kimberley Apple6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLindsay Norris / Leslie Ingram vs Sarah Faust / Amy Rogers6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKelley Norris vs Dana Saunders7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMarquin Campbell / Nancy Murphy vs Amy Kimbell / Kelli Reinstein6-0, 6-1
2025-03-14vs UPTA18A/Samuel-Posta/SouthsideWon 50
W#1 DoublesDeana Blanding / Paige Hawks vs Gloria Bleasdale / Teresa Fox6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesShely Landrum vs Cara Morris6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesReid Tollison / Val Kahler vs Madina Cauthen / Katy Davidson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCatherine Webb vs Eunice Samuel6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAli Wall / Hanna Lane vs Tamra Daws / Heather Warren6-2, 6-2
2025-03-07vs UPTA18A/Gunderson/PavilionLost 23
W#1 DoublesKristen Patel / Shely Landrum vs Jordan Wise / Brenda Jones6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesWhitney Blum vs Brooke Jones6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSusanne Norwood / Katherine Mattice vs Joanne Cruickshank / Elizabeth Raduns2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKelley Norris vs Leigh Wolke0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLindsay Norris / Reid Tollison vs Dorelly Herford / Patricia Surles2-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesJoanna Bragdon / Shely Landrum vs Ashley Brown / Riley Smith6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesWhitney Blum vs Catherine Boetsch7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesErin Piepkow / Reid Tollison vs Brittany McKenzie / Haley Eidson6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesVal Kahler vs Anne Taaffe2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesPaige Hawks / Kelly Geist vs Bobbi Bateman / Jaime Stevens7-6, 6-2
2025-02-28vs UPTA18A/Knight/HollyTreeWon 32
W#1 DoublesJoanna Bragdon / Erin Piepkow vs Jennifer Aughtry / Erica Ritter6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesShely Landrum vs Blair Brading6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesWhitney Blum / Kristen Patel vs Lora Henderson / Shelly James6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesAli Wall vs Lara Knight5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDeana Blanding / Kate Carlson vs Lisa Littleton / Suzy Clary6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Adult Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Kristen Patel
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.36
Joanna Bragdon
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.18
Betsy Norwood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Erin Piepkow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Shely Landrum
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.04
Reid Tollison
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.04
Whitney Blum
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.99
Sherwood Cobb
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Marquin Campbell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Ali Wall
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.90
Paige Hawks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Ann Ellison
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.83
Deana Blanding
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.82
Kelly Geist
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Catherine Webb
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.80
Hanna Lane
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Val Kahler
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.75
Katherine Mattice
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Leslie Ingram
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Susanne Norwood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Barbara Merline
published 3
2.48
Kelley Norris
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Katie Culumovic
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Riley Bignon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joanna Bragdon + Kristen Patel8078% games+20.0% vs expected
Erin Piepkow + Joanna Bragdon5254% games+2.7% vs expected
Whitney Blum + Kristen Patel3258% games+1.2% vs expected
Susanne Norwood + Katherine Mattice0636% games−8.3% vs expected
Sherwood Cobb + Ann Ellison1537% games−8.9% vs expected
Ann Ellison + Erin Piepkow3253% gamesnot enough data
Erin Piepkow + Whitney Blum3253% gamesnot enough data
Sherwood Cobb + Betsy Norwood224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristen Patel
47W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Joanna Bragdon
27W–8L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Betsy Norwood
17W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Erin Piepkow
19W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.11
Shely Landrum
25W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
Reid Tollison
10W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
Whitney Blum
29W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
Sherwood Cobb
14W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Marquin Campbell
10W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Ali Wall
13W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.95
Paige Hawks
11W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
3.5
Ann Ellison
19W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.90
3
Deana Blanding
8W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
Kelly Geist
18W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Catherine Webb
24W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.80
3
Hanna Lane
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
Val Kahler
12W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
Katherine Mattice
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Leslie Ingram
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
Susanne Norwood
3W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Barbara Merline
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.56
Kelley Norris
5W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.48
Katie Culumovic
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Riley Bignon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.