Teams

8-LBible-ENO

2024 Eno River Fall Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over 3.0 Women Evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-11-26Lost 01
L#1 SinglesLoralie Bible vs Kim McWhorter6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2024-11-19vs 2-DAllen-DFCSplit 11
W#1 SinglesRagini Singh vs Lindsey Wu6-0, 7-6
L#3 SinglesShannon Bartle vs Christine Kruse0-6, 6-7
2024-11-12Lost 12
W#1 SinglesRagini Singh vs Andrew Moon6-2, 6-0
L#2 SinglesJanet Ranheim vs Ana Goodwin0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesShannon Bartle vs Elizabeth Maulhardt2-6, 1-6
2024-11-05Won 10
W#1 SinglesLoralie Bible vs Barbara Wilhelm6-0, 6-3
2024-11-05Lost 01
L#2 SinglesJanet Ranheim vs Kirby Jethro1-6, 1-6
2024-10-29vs 6-JDeConto-ENOLost 02
L#2 SinglesLiz Schaller vs Kelly Travis1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesJanet Ranheim vs Julie DeConto5-7, 1-6
2024-10-25Won 30
W#1 SinglesRagini Singh vs Liza Terll6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesLiz Schaller vs Lori Salzmann6-4, 6-2
W#3 SinglesShannon Bartle vs Angela Boone6-4, 7-6
2024-10-22Won 20
W#2 SinglesRagini Singh vs Lissa Gotwals6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesLiz Schaller vs Barbie McGarrah6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-10-20vs 6-ACombs-CCCLost 01
L#2 SinglesLoralie Bible vs Elizabeth Bass1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
3.55
Loralie Bible
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.41
Ragini Singh
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Wilton Burns
published
2.75
Janet Ranheim
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.71
Liz Schaller
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3
2.43
Shannon Bartle
usually #3 Singles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liz Schaller + Shannon Bartle21241% games+0.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ekaterina Seregina
31W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.98
3.5
Loralie Bible
186W–65L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Ragini Singh
95W–47L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%76%23%
3.41
Wilton Burns
19W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
3.04
3
Janet Ranheim
108W–114L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Liz Schaller
76W–108L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Shannon Bartle
40W–155L career · 8 lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.