Teams

Powerhouse/Kendeva/Fremont

2026 Tri-Level 3.0 · 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-21vs Get em Girls/Jacob/MarinSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTammy Mason / Sylvia Cox vs Lisa Eastlack / Ria Mendoza2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesYANG LUO / Ann Kerdchonphet vs Clare Moran / Joanne Poile6-2, 6-0
2026-03-21vs The Waves/Gee/Half Moon BayWon 20
W#1 DoublesTheresa Goodwin / Candace Gee Koo vs Claire Toffey / Jillian Gee7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesElise D Harvey / Mona Lee vs Kaori Asakawa / Teresa Tan-Vial6-4, 6-4
2026-03-20vs Court Queens/Parise/SunnyvaleWon 30
W#1 DoublesSnjezana Maric / Tammy Mason vs Judy Halper / Teresa King4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesYemia Hashimoto / Theresa Goodwin vs Aiko Murakami / Diem Nguyen6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnn Kerdchonphet / Mona Lee vs Julie Lowe / Shiow-Rong Lin6-0, 6-2
2026-03-20vs We ball no CAP!/Logan/OaklandLost 12
W#1 DoublesCandace Gee Koo / Theresa Goodwin vs Pola Ebrahimi / Angela Logan6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesViviane Bahia / Aline Lima vs Kathy Maratukulam / Clairessa Brown6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesRenata Cunha / Christine Start vs Lauren Addicott / Samantha Ng3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lucky Girls/Chen/Saratoga40111586
2Wild Things/Barnacascel/Walnut Creek40102587
3Get em Girls/Jacob/Marin4093889
4Smash Sisters/Fischer/Napa318412115
5Gandalicious Team!/Regal/Bay Point227511101
6Powerhouse/Kendeva/Fremont227512106
7We ball no CAP!/Logan/Oakland227512112
8The Waves/Gee/Half Moon Bay227513112
9Grip it Rip its/Klein/Marin225715100
10Tri-Hards/Krueger/Danville134816113
11Court Queens/Parise/Sunnyvale134816127
12Mid-Court Crisis/Liles/Oakley134818138
13Net Gains/Myers/San Francisco133918120
14Vintage Volleyers/DeBord/Napa133919137
15Savvy Strikers/Parekh/Menlo Park0411123139

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Candace Gee Koo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Theresa Goodwin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.57
Yemia Hashimoto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Tammy Mason
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Sylvia Cox
published
3.44
Aline Lima
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Snjezana Maric
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Alicia Barco
published 3.5
3.29
Christine Start
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.28
Viviane Bahia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Mona Lee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Hazel Indick
published
3.02
YANG LUO
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Ann Kerdchonphet
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.95
Elise D Harvey
published
2.89
Renata Cunha
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Viviane Bahia + Aline Lima17659% games+8.5% vs expected
Alicia Barco + Yemia Hashimoto044 matchesnot enough data
Snjezana Maric + Yemia Hashimoto044 matchesnot enough data
Sylvia Cox + Snjezana Maric033 matchesnot enough data
Theresa Goodwin + Candace Gee Koo303 matchesnot enough data
Stanimira Ivanova Neykova Kendeva + Christine Start303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Candace Gee Koo
33W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.99
Theresa Goodwin
61W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.67
Yemia Hashimoto
37W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.57
Tammy Mason
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.53
Sylvia Cox
2W–18L career · no lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
3.45
3.5
Aline Lima
41W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
Stanimira Ivanova Neykova Kendeva
19W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.42
Snjezana Maric
18W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Alicia Barco
78W–66L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
3
Christine Start
25W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.29
Viviane Bahia
42W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Mona Lee
29W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.13
Hazel Indick
18W–15L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
YANG LUO
27W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Ann Kerdchonphet
35W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
Elise D Harvey
71W–78L career · no lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
Renata Cunha
23W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.