Teams

Gandalicious Team!/Regal/Bay Point

2026 Tri-Level 3.0 · 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-21vs Court Queens/Parise/SunnyvaleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJoma Ann Raniel / Cristy Ackerman vs Nancy Doan / Judy Halper6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMhavz Malado / Dorita Castillano vs Sridevi Parise / Diem Nguyen2-6, 5-7
2026-03-21vs Get em Girls/Jacob/MarinSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCorazon Bellamy / Olga Regal vs Ally Gwozdz / Tricia Jacob6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSara Bogado / Mhavz Malado vs Debra Hakman / Courtney Macomber6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-20vs Vintage Volleyers/DeBord/NapaWon 20
W#1 DoublesCorazon Bellamy / Olga Regal vs Eleanor Cooper / Deirdre Burke6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSara Bogado / Aileen Salamida vs Miriam DeQuadros / Amanda DeBord7-6, 6-4
2026-03-20vs We ball no CAP!/Logan/OaklandWon 21
L#1 DoublesJoma Ann Raniel / Cristy Ackerman vs Allyson Garcia / Ana Caroline Leon Williams7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMhavz Malado / Dorita Castillano vs Jasmine Morgan / Lily Gilels6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesFlorita Labrador / Alessandra Mendes vs Gnaumie-Monique Valle / Samantha Ng6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lucky Girls/Chen/Saratoga40111586
2Wild Things/Barnacascel/Walnut Creek40102587
3Get em Girls/Jacob/Marin4093889
4Smash Sisters/Fischer/Napa318412115
5Gandalicious Team!/Regal/Bay Point227511101
6Powerhouse/Kendeva/Fremont227512106
7We ball no CAP!/Logan/Oakland227512112
8The Waves/Gee/Half Moon Bay227513112
9Grip it Rip its/Klein/Marin225715100
10Tri-Hards/Krueger/Danville134816113
11Court Queens/Parise/Sunnyvale134816127
12Mid-Court Crisis/Liles/Oakley134818138
13Net Gains/Myers/San Francisco133918120
14Vintage Volleyers/DeBord/Napa133919137
15Savvy Strikers/Parekh/Menlo Park0411123139

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Corazon Bellamy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Cristy Ackerman
published 4
3.85
Joma Ann Raniel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Olga Regal
published
3.61
Mhavz Malado
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Sara Bogado
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Dorita Castillano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Aileen Salamida
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Kari Trimble
published
2.98
Florita Labrador
published
2.86
Alessandra Mendes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Nellie Proulx
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Olga Regal + Corazon Bellamy9068% games+11.6% vs expected
Cristy Ackerman + Mhavz Malado5068% gamesnot enough data
Cristy Ackerman + Joma Ann Raniel224 matchesnot enough data
Mhavz Malado + Joma Ann Raniel224 matchesnot enough data
Mhavz Malado + Dorita Castillano314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Corazon Bellamy
39W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
4.04
4
Cristy Ackerman
33W–5L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
Joma Ann Raniel
30W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.85
Olga Regal
28W–6L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.76
Mhavz Malado
39W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.61
Sara Bogado
15W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
Dorita Castillano
27W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Aileen Salamida
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Kari Trimble
44W–63L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.15
Florita Labrador
70W–72L career · no lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Alessandra Mendes
15W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
Nellie Proulx
18W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.