Teams

SGV Dare Doubles-Parmar-WN/SU

2025 SoCal FALL Team Singles · SGV - Men 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
W#1 SinglesSteinway Huang vs Nico Paolella7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJose Ochoa vs Tang-yu Kao4-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesJames Grollman vs Han Xu6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-11-09vs SGV ZZZ-Zang-WN/SA10Won 10
W#2 SinglesHaochuan Lin vs Andy Zang6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-11-01vs SGV Trouble Makers -Lee-SA8/10Won 20
W#1 SinglesSteinway Huang vs Paul Tu6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesManoj Parmar vs Tyson Tieu6-4, 6-0
L#2 SinglesJames Grollman vs Andrew Yao1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesSteinway Huang vs Steven Lin6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesManoj Parmar vs Han Xu6-1, 6-2
L#3 SinglesRicardo de la Cruz vs Wilson Tran6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-10-04vs SGV ZZZ-Zang-WN/SA10Lost 02
L#1 SinglesHaochuan Lin vs Andy Zang2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesJames Grollman vs Kirby Xu4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-09-21vs SGV Trouble Makers -Lee-SA8/10Won 20
W#2 SinglesHaochuan Lin vs Tony Law3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJames Grollman vs Zhilin Zhang6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJose Ochoa vs Evan Liu1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesRicardo de la Cruz vs Eric Anderson6-3, 6-3
L#3 SinglesJasen Ha vs Abraam Guirguis3-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Steinway Huang
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.78
Manoj Parmar
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.43
Jasen Ha
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.43
Keon Ha Hwang
published
3.25
Vacheh W Avanessian
published
3.12
Jose Ochoa
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.10
Haochuan Lin
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.96
James Grollman
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
David Mandel
published 3
Ricardo de la Cruz
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Manoj Parmar + Steinway Huang303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Steinway Huang
73W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Manoj Parmar
148W–42L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Jasen Ha
16W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Keon Ha Hwang
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Vacheh W Avanessian
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Jose Ochoa
17W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
Haochuan Lin
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
James Grollman
6W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
David Mandel
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ricardo de la Cruz
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.