Teams

SGV Trouble Makers -Lee-SA8/10

2025 SoCal FALL Team Singles · SGV - Men 3.5

8 players · average NTRP / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#2 SinglesPaul Tu vs Andrew Yao2-6, 6-7
L#3 SinglesTyson Tieu vs Alex Sanchez2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesTyson Tieu vs Richard Lie3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesTony Law vs Neal St. Clair1-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesRoger Yin vs Wilson Tran1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesTyson Tieu vs Han Xu1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesRong Huang vs Steven Lin2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesRoger Yin vs Tang-yu Kao3-6, 0-6
2025-10-26Lost 01
L#2 SinglesVic Kan vs Xiao Zhang1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesRong Huang vs Daniel Herman1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesJustin Lee vs Elias Johansson-Miller1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesTony Law vs Jacob Braun2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesZhilin Zhang vs Abraam Guirguis1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesTyson Tieu vs Andrew Chin1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesPaul Tu vs Steven Lin3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesRong Huang vs Yuxi Huang1-6, 2-6
2025-09-21vs SGV Dare Doubles-Parmar-WN/SULost 03
L#1 SinglesVic Kan vs Alan Lee2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesTony Law vs Haochuan Lin6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesZhilin Zhang vs James Grollman0-6, 1-6
2025-09-20vs SGV ZZZ-Zang-WN/SA10Lost 03
L#1 SinglesTony Law vs Gustavo Diaz Gamez4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJustin Lee vs Andy Zang1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesRong Huang vs Kirby Xu1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Vic Kan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.40
Rong Huang
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.27
Tony Law
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.24
Roger Yin
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.19
Justin Lee
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.90
Tyson Tieu
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Paul Tu
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Zhilin Zhang
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roger Yin + Vic Kan7260% games+3.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vic Kan
17W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.44
Rong Huang
15W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.40
Tony Law
6W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Roger Yin
11W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.24
Justin Lee
13W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
Tyson Tieu
3W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.90
Paul Tu
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Zhilin Zhang
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.