Teams

Homewood - Harris

2025 B'ham Spring - 55 & Over Weeknight · 3.0 Men - Monday

13 players · average NTRP 2.90 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-16vs BH - ChomiczLost 12
L#1 DoublesTim Clanton / BRIAN Harris vs Wayne Barre / Matt Heydinger2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLane Finch / Kary Keasler vs Jim Chomicz / James Vaughn6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJames Green / David Clanton vs Wade Utley / Duane Bradley2-6, 3-6
2025-03-31vs Hoover Met - Croley/SlovenskyLost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid Reeves / Tim Dwyer vs Jeffrey Lovett / Al Maiola Jr6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJoe Crain / Brad Crawford vs Danny Slovensky / Mark Haladwala2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPaul Kellett / Kary Keasler vs Terry Pouncey / Brett Ross4-6, 1-6
2025-03-17vs BH - ChomiczLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrad Crawford / Patrick Holt vs Thomas Hardison / Matt Heydinger4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Fort / Tim Dwyer vs Thomas Howard / Mark Partain6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesScott Fort / Kary Keasler vs Brian Clifton / David Swanson6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2025-03-10vs Hoover Met - Croley/SlovenskyLost 12
L#1 DoublesBRIAN Harris / Lane Finch vs Danny Slovensky / Brett Ross7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTim Clanton / Brad Crawford vs John Hoerner / Jerome Arnold6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Clanton / Kary Keasler vs Leslie Tucker / John Parker2-6, 2-6
2025-03-03vs Hoover Met - Croley/SlovenskyLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrad Crawford / David Fort vs Mark Haladwala / Ed Bauer4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesScott Fort / Patrick Holt vs Jerome Arnold / John Parker6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKary Keasler / Paul Kellett vs John Hoerner / Tom Williams6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2025-02-24vs BH - ChomiczWon 21
L#1 DoublesTim Dwyer / Lane Finch vs Matt Heydinger / Wayne Barre4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBRIAN Harris / Brad Crawford vs Mike Whisonant / Phillip Smith6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDavid Clanton / Patrick Holt vs Thomas Howard / Wade Utley3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-02-10vs Hoover Met - Croley/SlovenskyLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Reeves / Tim Dwyer vs Terry Pouncey / Brett Ross3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTim Clanton / Kary Keasler vs Ed Bauer / Mark Haladwala7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesScott Fort / David Fort vs Scott Boyd / Tom Williams6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-02-03vs BH - ChomiczLost 03
L#1 DoublesTim Clanton / David Reeves vs Matt Heydinger / Amin Ali7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLane Finch / Paul Kellett vs Phillip Smith / Mike Whisonant4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJames Green / Kary Keasler vs David Swanson / James Vaughn6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men - Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
David Reeves
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Kary Keasler
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.90
Tim Clanton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.89
BRIAN Harris
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Brad Crawford
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.63
Scott Fort
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
David Fort
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.60
Joe Crain
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Paul Kellett
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.06
David Clanton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Lane Finch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Patrick Holt
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tim Dwyer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Reeves + Tim Clanton3256% games+5.6% vs expected
BRIAN Harris + Tim Clanton10656% games+3.8% vs expected
Scott Fort + David Fort2346% games−0.5% vs expected
Brad Crawford + BRIAN Harris224 matchesnot enough data
Brad Crawford + David Reeves303 matchesnot enough data
Brad Crawford + Tim Clanton213 matchesnot enough data
Brad Crawford + David Fort123 matchesnot enough data
BRIAN Harris + David Reeves213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
David Reeves
40W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Kary Keasler
13W–12L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Tim Clanton
42W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
BRIAN Harris
25W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Brad Crawford
11W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.84
Scott Fort
6W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
David Fort
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60
Joe Crain
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
Paul Kellett
0W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.46
2.5
David Clanton
1W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Lane Finch
1W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patrick Holt
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tim Dwyer
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.