Teams

BH - Chomicz

2025 B'ham Spring - 55 & Over Weeknight · 3.0 Men - Monday

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-16vs Homewood - HarrisWon 21
W#1 DoublesWayne Barre / Matt Heydinger vs Tim Clanton / BRIAN Harris6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJim Chomicz / James Vaughn vs Lane Finch / Kary Keasler7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesWade Utley / Duane Bradley vs James Green / David Clanton6-2, 6-3
2025-03-19vs Hoover Met - Croley/SlovenskyLost 03
L#1 DoublesPhillip Smith / Thomas Hardison vs Mark Haladwala / Ed Bauer4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesWayne Barre / Mark Partain vs Danny Slovensky / Terry Pouncey6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesWade Utley / Jim Chomicz vs Al Maiola Jr / John Parker3-6, 0-6
2025-03-17vs Homewood - HarrisWon 20
W#1 DoublesThomas Hardison / Matt Heydinger vs Brad Crawford / Patrick Holt6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesThomas Howard / Mark Partain vs David Fort / Tim Dwyer4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-03-17vs Hoover Met - Croley/SlovenskyWon 21
W#1 DoublesWayne Barre / Matt Heydinger vs Danny Slovensky / Jeffrey Lovett6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPhillip Smith / Mike Whisonant vs Mark Haladwala / Ed Bauer2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJames Vaughn / Duane Bradley vs Leslie Tucker / John Parker7-5, 7-6
2025-02-26vs Hoover Met - Croley/SlovenskyWon 21
W#1 DoublesWayne Barre / Matt Heydinger vs Terry Pouncey / Ed Bauer6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesThomas Hardison / Phillip Smith vs Leslie Tucker / Al Maiola Jr6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJim Chomicz / Brian Clifton vs Scott Boyd / John Hoerner4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-02-24vs Homewood - HarrisLost 12
W#1 DoublesMatt Heydinger / Wayne Barre vs Tim Dwyer / Lane Finch6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMike Whisonant / Phillip Smith vs BRIAN Harris / Brad Crawford0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesThomas Howard / Wade Utley vs David Clanton / Patrick Holt3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-02-03vs Homewood - HarrisWon 30
W#1 DoublesMatt Heydinger / Amin Ali vs Tim Clanton / David Reeves6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPhillip Smith / Mike Whisonant vs Lane Finch / Paul Kellett6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDavid Swanson / James Vaughn vs James Green / Kary Keasler7-6, 6-4
2025-01-27vs Hoover Met - Croley/SlovenskyWon 21
W#1 DoublesMatt Heydinger / Amin Ali vs Danny Slovensky / Mark Haladwala6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMark Partain / Thomas Howard vs Scott Boyd / John Hoerner1-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJim Chomicz / Thomas Hardison vs Leslie Tucker / Terry Pouncey2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men - Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Matt Heydinger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Phillip Smith
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.79
James Vaughn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Duane Bradley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Thomas Hardison
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.69
Amin Ali
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Jim Chomicz
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.67
Mark Partain
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Wayne Barre
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.67
Mike Whisonant
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Wade Utley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Howard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wayne Barre + Matt Heydinger10070% games+12.3% vs expected
Thomas Hardison + Phillip Smith9359% games+4.7% vs expected
Mark Partain + Thomas Howard3246% games−6.1% vs expected
Wayne Barre + Mike Whisonant134 matchesnot enough data
Mike Whisonant + James Vaughn224 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Hardison + Matt Heydinger213 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Hardison + Mark Partain033 matchesnot enough data
Phillip Smith + Mike Whisonant123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matt Heydinger
58W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.41
Phillip Smith
41W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.10
3
James Vaughn
22W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Duane Bradley
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
2.78
Thomas Hardison
15W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Amin Ali
21W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%92%1%
2.69
Jim Chomicz
4W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
Mark Partain
19W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67
Wayne Barre
22W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67
Mike Whisonant
6W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67
Wade Utley
4W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.58
Thomas Howard
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.