Teams

SGV Old Gummies-Manley-Arroyo high/SU8

2026 Adult Division - 40& Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.73 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#2 DoublesEllen Yarter / Celeste Nameth vs Jenny Lin / Bonnie Cheung1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKiyomi Fisher / Miki Makiko Shimizu vs Stephanie Smith / Lupe Lopez2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMae Huey / Maryann Yamamoto vs Kristin McQueen / Rebecca Stokes5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLaurie Manley / Madeline Chang vs Holly Lieberenz / Erin Newsome Moltz1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 DoublesKiyomi Fisher / Celeste Nameth vs Franciz Bragg / Ellie Wei2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLaurie Manley / Aydee Martinez vs Sherie Paulson / Tina Gong3-6, 5-7
2026-02-08vs SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SU8Won 20
W#1 DoublesAmy Hasquet / Jenna Parker vs Christine Russell / Ellen Plummer6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMadeline Chang / Laurie Manley vs Barbara Grom / Carmen Martinez0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 DoublesJudy Su / Madeline Chang vs Rumduol Vuong / Deborah Babineau4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAydee Martinez / Jenna Parker vs Emily Taylor / Cristina Padron2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaurie Manley / Hairong Cusack vs May de Castro / Elizabeth Hall3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 DoublesJudy Su / Hairong Cusack vs Roseann DeRosa / Theona Zhordania1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 DoublesLaurie Manley / Judy Su vs Michele Ivey / Theresa Mistretta3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMaryann Yamamoto / Mae Huey vs Jami Johnson / Suzanne JOhnson0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCeleste Nameth / Kiyomi Fisher vs Jennifer Miller / Shannon Sapp1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · SGV - Women 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SGV LLW Mo Better Tennis-DeRosa-WN/SA1071211126221
2SGV Terminetters- Bennett-Scholl/SA562211127233
3SGV Creme de la Court- Kim-Flint Cyn/SU253161634274
4SGV TCC Tennis-Johnson-Claremont Club/SU844171534279
5SGV Live Oaks "Old" Ladies-Perry-Live Oaks/SA126122047326
6SGV Old Gummies-Manley-Arroyo high/SU80892352347

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Madeline Chang
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.82
Judy Su
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Teri Gustafson
published 4
3.71
Jenna Parker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.58
Hairong Cusack
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.57
Amy Hasquet
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.54
Veronica Saucedo
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.49
Aydee Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.40
Laurie Manley
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.40
Maryann Yamamoto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Nancy Pashayan
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.37
Catherine Haggett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Kiyomi Fisher
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 46% · published 3.5
3.27
Ellen Yarter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Miki Makiko Shimizu
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.05
Mae Huey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Celeste Nameth
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kiyomi Fisher + Catherine Haggett71147% games+3.0% vs expected
Kiyomi Fisher + Miki Makiko Shimizu4538% games−3.2% vs expected
Kiyomi Fisher + Teri Gustafson5360% gamesnot enough data
Kiyomi Fisher + Celeste Nameth0520% gamesnot enough data
Mae Huey + Maryann Yamamoto044 matchesnot enough data
Judy Su + Madeline Chang224 matchesnot enough data
Judy Su + Hairong Cusack033 matchesnot enough data
Aydee Martinez + Kiyomi Fisher033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Madeline Chang
27W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.84
Judy Su
11W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Teri Gustafson
84W–67L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.72
Jenna Parker
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Hairong Cusack
17W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Amy Hasquet
92W–169L career · 4 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Veronica Saucedo
145W–113L career · 6 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.54
4
Aydee Martinez
81W–78L career · 3 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
3.49
Laurie Manley
8W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
3.40
Maryann Yamamoto
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
3.40
3.5
Nancy Pashayan
61W–75L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Catherine Haggett
99W–122L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Kiyomi Fisher
87W–140L career · 11 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Ellen Yarter
82W–127L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Miki Makiko Shimizu
20W–32L career · 7 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Mae Huey
18W–86L career · 3 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.05
3.5
Celeste Nameth
4W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.