Teams

SGV LLW Mo Better Tennis-DeRosa-WN/SA10

2026 Adult Division - 40& Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 SinglesStacey Lam vs Stephanie Smith6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Moss / Lisa Partain vs Cathy Lee / Mary Chou6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesClaudia Ibarra / Xiaochun Wang vs Geneva Roe / Cris Stark6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCarol Ecker / Lisa Partain vs Shaheen Plunier / Anhtu Pham6-0, 6-3
W#1 DoublesClaudia Ibarra / Xiaochun Wang vs Kasia Chmielewski / Stephanie Perry6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesStacey Lam vs Amy Newhall6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLisa Licht / Lisa Partain vs Katherine Kitchens / Danica Hughes3-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesTheona Zhordania / Carol Ecker vs Irina Abadzheva / Susan Yu3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesStacey Lam vs Joanne Kim6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKelly Moss / Lisa Partain vs Penapa Frick / Melissa Mazin1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCarol Ecker / Lisa Partain vs Adrienne Beauvois / Christie Boniface6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTheona Zhordania / Kelly Moss vs Franciz Bragg / Rebecca Escandon6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCarol Ecker / Lisa Partain vs Nancy Pashayan / Kiyomi Fisher6-3, 6-4
2026-01-18vs SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SU8Lost 12
W#1 SinglesStacey Lam vs Yu Liu6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesClaudia Ibarra / Lisa Licht vs Jill Jobran / Monica Anderson2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesViviana Kim / Lana Dalley vs Georgia Cano / Christine Russell2-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesRoseann DeRosa / Kelly Moss vs Minnie Ingersoll / Deborah Babineau2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Licht / Viviana Kim vs Milou Lee / Sean Ky1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · SGV - Women 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SGV LLW Mo Better Tennis-DeRosa-WN/SA1071211126221
2SGV Terminetters- Bennett-Scholl/SA562211127233
3SGV Creme de la Court- Kim-Flint Cyn/SU253161634274
4SGV TCC Tennis-Johnson-Claremont Club/SU844171534279
5SGV Live Oaks "Old" Ladies-Perry-Live Oaks/SA126122047326
6SGV Old Gummies-Manley-Arroyo high/SU80892352347

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Dana Boyan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.85
Stacey Lam
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.85
Maria Rose
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Claudia Ibarra
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.78
Xiaochun Wang
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.76
Lisa Partain
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Kelly Moss
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.72
Carol Ecker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.70
Roseann DeRosa
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 4
3.68
Theona Zhordania
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.68
Kim Graham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.68
Lana Dalley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Gloria Ziperovich
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.63
Lisa Licht
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.41
Viviana Kim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roseann DeRosa + Gloria Ziperovich9354% games+6.5% vs expected
Claudia Ibarra + Roseann DeRosa11952% games+5.9% vs expected
Carol Ecker + Lisa Partain11260% games+5.0% vs expected
Theona Zhordania + Roseann DeRosa191651% games+1.2% vs expected
Claudia Ibarra + Theona Zhordania6358% gamesnot enough data
Claudia Ibarra + Gloria Ziperovich6357% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Moss + Lisa Partain3256% gamesnot enough data
Viviana Kim + Lana Dalley224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dana Boyan
177W–81L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.96
Stacey Lam
10W–2L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.85
4
Maria Rose
100W–51L career · 1 line in 2026
1%86%14%
3.85
4
Claudia Ibarra
97W–62L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
Xiaochun Wang
4W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.78
4
Lisa Partain
57W–52L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
Kelly Moss
8W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Carol Ecker
13W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Roseann DeRosa
162W–106L career · 9 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Theona Zhordania
117W–121L career · 7 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Kim Graham
20W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Lana Dalley
19W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Gloria Ziperovich
81W–81L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
Lisa Licht
10W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.63
Viviana Kim
82W–134L career · 2 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
3.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.