Teams

Dynamic Doozies

2023 FLEX Dynamic Duo - Treasure Valley · Women 4.0+

3 players · average NTRP 4.00 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-08-24vs Sets In The CityWon 10
W#2 SinglesAmy Steckel vs Robyn Roby6-1
2023-08-03vs HillcrestWon 10
W#1 SinglesAmy Steckel vs Janelle Carr6-2
2023-07-25vs AndersonWon 10
W#2 SinglesAmy Steckel vs Suzanne Baran6-3
2023-07-12vs Love StinksWon 10
W#2 SinglesAmy Steckel vs Courtney Sticka6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · Women 4.0+
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sets In The City50123358
2Oops, I Hit it Again41114447
3Dynamic Doozies3287762
4Anderson2369972
5Love Stinks145101075
6Hillcrest053121279

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Amy Steckel
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.64
Shelley Hunter
published
3.49
Cindy Duncan
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Steckel + Cindy Duncan21443% games−9.1% vs expected
Shelley Hunter + Amy Steckel6847% gamesnot enough data
Shelley Hunter + Cindy Duncan6454% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Steckel
116W–122L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.72
Shelley Hunter
96W–100L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Cindy Duncan
34W–64L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.