Teams

Chandlers Landing/Stasiak M8.0

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 55 & Over ADULT · M8.0 Sunday

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-01-18vs Oak Creek/Rajani-Shim M8.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJody Edwards / Trent Norris vs Doug Walker / Wei-Bin Lai1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Stasiak / Frederick Cass vs Jae Shim / Robert Wertz1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChuck Menges / Robert Fitzgerald vs Dongxiao Liu / Shaoli Fang3-6, 1-6
2026-01-11vs McKinney/Possehl M8.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesJody Edwards / Craig Waters vs Shawn Hamilton / Lindsey Taft6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTrent Norris / Robert Fitzgerald vs Don Pierce / Douglas Wallace4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesFrederick Cass / Chris Lanzone vs Russel Head / Gino Diazoni6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for M8.0 Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Craig Waters
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Chuck Menges
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Dale Ridenour
published 4
3.58
Chris Lanzone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Frederick Cass
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jody Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jonathan Mefferd
published
Michael Stasiak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Fitzgerald
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Trent Norris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Craig Waters + Jody Edwards5647% gamesnot enough data
Trent Norris + Robert Fitzgerald123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Craig Waters
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Chuck Menges
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Dale Ridenour
4W–4L career · no lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.68
4
Chris Lanzone
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.58
Frederick Cass
17W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Jody Edwards
7W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jonathan Mefferd
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Stasiak
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Robert Fitzgerald
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Trent Norris
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.