Teams

Be.Beam40A

2025 Capital Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-11Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSusan Hembarsky / Leslie Wright vs Rachel Matthews / Heather Brewer1-6, 2-6
2025-05-05vs Al.Crumpler40ALost 02
L#1 DoublesCarrie Russell / Susan Hembarsky vs Lindsey Klein / Sharon Baggett2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLeslie Wright / Tara Spina vs Jeanie White / Meggy Campbell6-7, 1-6
2025-04-23vs Ro.Bonello40ALost 02
L#1 SinglesMariana Lima Gonzalez vs Renee Stegman0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLeslie Wright / Susan Hembarsky vs Tiffany Harris / Jenny Coley2-6, 1-6
2025-04-21vs Ka.Conley40ALost 02
L#1 SinglesMariana Lima Gonzalez vs Julie Cronin1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTara Spina / Leslie Wright vs Deb Lanier / Sarah Bell4-6, 3-6
2025-04-10vs Er.Conigliaro40ALost 12
L#1 DoublesDaphne Driscoll / Leigh Kimball vs Kana Brinckerhoff / Gabrielle Shields2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMariana Lima Gonzalez vs Nikki DAmbrose6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLeslie Wright / Tara Spina vs Liz Arcos / Manjula Nagaraja2-6, 5-7
2025-03-24Won 20
W#1 SinglesMariana Lima Gonzalez vs Emily Larson6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarrie Russell / Tara Spina vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-17vs Ma.May40ALost 01
L#3 DoublesLeslie Wright / Susan Hembarsky vs Marti May / Karen McKee1-6, 4-6
2025-03-10vs Ly.Manweiler40ALost 02
L#1 DoublesKathryn Beth Beam / Leigh Kimball vs Shelly Schiff / Juli Korsnack4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTara Spina / Leslie Wright vs Jamie Martin / Jennifer London0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Mariana Lima Gonzalez
usually #1 Singles 89%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 4
3.58
Susan Tadder
published
3.52
Leigh Kimball
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Kathryn Beth Beam
published
3.34
Carrie Russell
published 3.5
3.21
Ashley Walton
published 3.5
3.18
Susan Hembarsky
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.05
Tara Spina
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mariana Lima Gonzalez + Kathryn Beth Beam213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mariana Lima Gonzalez
128W–73L career · 9 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Susan Tadder
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Leigh Kimball
57W–73L career · 2 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.52
Kathryn Beth Beam
4W–14L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Carrie Russell
21W–19L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Ashley Walton
17W–18L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Susan Hembarsky
101W–133L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.18
3
Tara Spina
191W–125L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.