Teams

Baseline Belles

2025 Fall Adult League · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.12 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-20vs Wailea Surf AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaurel Falit / Melissa Padillla vs Darlene Haslam / Leslie Wilshusen2-6, 4-6
2025-12-14vs MCC BaddiesWon 20
W#1 DoublesRachel Kofron / Jennifer Kelley vs Sabrina Jardine / Chihwa Tang7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesErika Varcak / Melissa Padillla vs Janet Davis / Melanie Devereux6-1, 7-5
2025-12-13vs Wailea Surf AcesWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelissa Padillla / Susan Bailey vs Barbara Botkin / Leslie Wilshusen6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesErika Varcak vs Colette Watanabe6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesStephanie Carlsen / Rachel Kofron vs Darlene Haslam / Trista Campbell6-1, 6-4
2025-12-07vs MCC BaddiesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSusan Bailey / Rachel Kofron vs Niki Cumming / Mindy Armour6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaurel Falit / Jennifer Kelley vs Chihwa Tang / Melanie Devereux3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-12-05vs MCC BaddiesLost 12
L#1 DoublesRachel Kofron / Susan Bailey vs Niki Cumming / Chihwa Tang4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesErika Varcak vs Allison Kermode7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Lofaro / Melissa Padillla vs Alexandra Falk / Sabrina Jardine3-6, 4-6
2025-11-29vs Wailea Surf AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesRachel Kofron / Elizabeth Lofaro vs Kelley Holtman / Leslie Wilshusen5-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Natalie Plotkin
published
3.16
Rachel Kofron
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.09
Laurel Falit
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.05
Erika Varcak
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.04
Stephanie Carlsen
published
3.02
Jennifer Kelley
published
2.93
Melissa Padillla
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Elizabeth Lofaro
published
Susan Bailey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurel Falit + Rachel Kofron213 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Padillla + Erika Varcak123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Plotkin
19W–16L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Rachel Kofron
22W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
3
Laurel Falit
72W–57L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.09
3
Erika Varcak
36W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
Stephanie Carlsen
16W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
Jennifer Kelley
19W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Melissa Padillla
39W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Elizabeth Lofaro
16W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Susan Bailey
23W–40L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.