Teams

Hogue/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Women - Monday AM

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-28vs Baird/White/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesGrace Hogue / Kelsey Wilmore vs Mandy Rogers / Jenna Gunnels6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJill Farrow / Laura Corder vs Sarah Baird / Sarah White5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAli Peace / Jessica McLean vs Helen Lanning / Becky Williamson6-1, 6-3
2025-04-15vs Baird/White/NashvilleWon 40
W#1 DoublesKelsey Wilmore / Laura Corder vs Maggie Vandever / Mandy Rogers6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGrace Hogue / Ally Bateman vs Brooke Parrish / Felicia Gannon4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLauren Hocker vs Margaret Massengille3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCaroline Bailey / Sarah Enstice vs Helen Lanning / Becky Williamson3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-04-13vs Pulley/NashvilleWon 32
W#1 DoublesCaroline Bailey / Kelsey Wilmore vs Karen Vasil / Patricia Clair6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesCarey Peek vs Vesna Pavlovic6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Corder / Nicole Hogue vs Patricia Franks / Michelle Vandevier6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesSarah Enstice vs Kaitlin Flynn2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAlly Bateman / Suzanne Lawing vs Linda Hope / LaTanya Sandy Johnson6-0, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women - Monday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Grace Hogue
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Kelsey Wilmore
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.09
Sarah Enstice
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.04
Suzanne Lawing
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Carey Peek
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.96
Jill Farrow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Anne Knight
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.88
Nicole Hogue
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Ally Bateman
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.82
Ali Peace
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Lauren Hocker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.73
Jessica McLean
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Ellen Hollis
published
Kailey Dickerson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Laura Corder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Lawing + Lauren Hocker1434% games−6.8% vs expected
Sarah Enstice + Grace Hogue4162% gamesnot enough data
Ellen Hollis + Ali Peace314 matchesnot enough data
Ally Bateman + Grace Hogue303 matchesnot enough data
Ally Bateman + Nicole Hogue213 matchesnot enough data
Laura Corder + Kelsey Wilmore213 matchesnot enough data
Grace Hogue + Kelsey Wilmore303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Grace Hogue
23W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.13
Kelsey Wilmore
15W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.12
Sarah Enstice
28W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.09
Suzanne Lawing
10W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Carey Peek
9W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Jill Farrow
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Anne Knight
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Nicole Hogue
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Ally Bateman
16W–14L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Ali Peace
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Lauren Hocker
17W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Jessica McLean
7W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Ellen Hollis
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Kailey Dickerson
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Corder
9W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.