Teams

Pulley/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Women - Monday AM

16 players · average NTRP 2.75 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-29vs Dyer/NashvilleWon 41
W#1 DoublesAmy Hirt / Laura Vidalakis vs Lindsey Burroughs / Angie Simmons6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKaitlin Flynn vs Jamie Walker6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNatalie Studdard / Michelle Vandevier vs Casey Dyer / Olivia Dial0-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesVesna Pavlovic vs Tiffany Bard6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJanet McMeen / Patricia Clair vs Chanel Doree / Katie Dowdell6-2, 6-3
2025-04-13vs Hogue/NashvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesKaren Vasil / Patricia Clair vs Caroline Bailey / Kelsey Wilmore2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesVesna Pavlovic vs Carey Peek3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatricia Franks / Michelle Vandevier vs Laura Corder / Nicole Hogue2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesKaitlin Flynn vs Sarah Enstice6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLinda Hope / LaTanya Sandy Johnson vs Ally Bateman / Suzanne Lawing0-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-04-01vs Frame/Brown/NashvilleSplit 11
W#1 SinglesKaitlin Flynn vs Jenny East0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNancy Allan / Veronica Pulley vs Shannon Fox / Beth Brown3-6, 1-6
2025-03-24vs Dyer/NashvilleWon 41
W#1 DoublesKaren Vasil / Amy Hirt vs Casey Dyer / Paige Succop6-0, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesVesna Pavlovic vs Olivia Dial6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRobin Buchanan / Patricia Franks vs Hays Estes / Lindsay Landman6-1, 7-6
W#2 SinglesPatricia Clair vs Tiffany Bard6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesNatalie Studdard / LaTanya Sandy Johnson vs Angie Simmons / Lindsey Burroughs5-7, 3-6
2025-03-21vs Baird/White/NashvilleWon 32
L#1 DoublesNancy Allan / Laura Vidalakis vs Maggie Vandever / Mandy Rogers4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKaitlin Flynn vs Felicia Gannon6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobin Buchanan / Patricia Clair vs Becky Williamson / Helen Lanning6-4, 7-6
W#2 SinglesKaren Vasil vs Jenna Gunnels6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPatricia Franks / Michelle Vandevier vs Sarah White / Hannah Harrison5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women - Monday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Vesna Pavlovic
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.15
Kaitlin Flynn
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.98
Patricia Clair
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.90
Laura Vidalakis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Patricia Franks
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.82
Veronica Pulley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Amy Hirt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Janet McMeen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Karen Vasil
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.60
Linda Hope
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
LaTanya Sandy Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Michelle Vandevier
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.53
Robin Buchanan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Anissa Adams
published 2.5
Nancy Allan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Natalie Studdard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robin Buchanan + LaTanya Sandy Johnson3249% games−4.7% vs expected
Robin Buchanan + Janet McMeen314 matchesnot enough data
LaTanya Sandy Johnson + Linda Hope044 matchesnot enough data
Janet McMeen + Karen Vasil134 matchesnot enough data
Amy Hirt + Karen Vasil314 matchesnot enough data
Veronica Pulley + Nancy Allan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vesna Pavlovic
36W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.22
Kaitlin Flynn
19W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.15
Patricia Clair
18W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Laura Vidalakis
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Patricia Franks
8W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Veronica Pulley
13W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%9%
2.82
3
Amy Hirt
10W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Janet McMeen
17W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Karen Vasil
11W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
Linda Hope
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
24%75%<1%
2.60
LaTanya Sandy Johnson
8W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
2.59
Michelle Vandevier
1W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.57
Robin Buchanan
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
2.5
Anissa Adams
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
Nancy Allan
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Natalie Studdard
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.