Teams

Kalispell Tri

2026 Tri Level · Tri Level Women 3.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MONTANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-30vs Drop Shot Like Its HotLost 12
L#1 DoublesSara Hemmer / Anne Oehlerich vs Cassie Springer / Maria Staszcuk5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKelly Woodall / Kimberly Cook vs Sarah Hamilton / Emily Davis3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKym Tranel / Danielle Sebastian vs Elisabeth Souther / Judy Lazaro6-4, 6-3
2026-08-30vs Trilogy'sWon 21
W#1 DoublesSara Hemmer / Anne Oehlerich vs Kimimi Ashley / Sue Clark5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKelly Woodall / Kimberly Cook vs Michelle Weinberg / Terri Ruthruff1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKym Tranel / Danielle Sebastian vs Heather Pina / Rasa Morris6-4, 6-3
2026-08-29vs Drop Shot Like Its HotLost 12
L#1 DoublesSara Hemmer / Anne Oehlerich vs Maria Staszcuk / Cassie Springer1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKelly Woodall / Kimberly Cook vs Sarah Hamilton / Emily Davis1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKym Tranel / Danielle Sebastian vs Elisabeth Souther / Judy Lazaro6-3, 6-4
2026-08-29vs RaquettesLost 12
W#1 DoublesSara Hemmer / Anne Oehlerich vs Amy Berghold / Elizabeth Helton6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKimberly Cook / Kelly Woodall vs Katherine Gaddis / Faye Nelson2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKym Tranel / Danielle Sebastian vs Maria King / Diana Saros4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Tri Level Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Raquettes000000
2Drop Shot Like Its Hot000000
3Kalispell Tri000000
4Trilogy's000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Sara Hemmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Anne Oehlerich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.24
Kimberly Cook
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Kelly Woodall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.89
Kym Tranel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Danielle Sebastian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Hemmer + Anne Oehlerich5361% games+8.1% vs expected
Danielle Sebastian + Kym Tranel314 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Woodall + Kimberly Cook044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sara Hemmer
29W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Anne Oehlerich
8W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Kimberly Cook
5W–6L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Kelly Woodall
2W–7L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Kym Tranel
12W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Danielle Sebastian
11W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.