Teams

GEPTA/18&overMX/4.0/Brown/EPTC#4

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA MIXED 18 & OVER LEAGUE

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2026 USA MIXED 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Ismael Arellano Flores
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.89
Mike Caldarella
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.75
Aram Trejo
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.69
Beth Hoy
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 19% · published 4
3.64
JENNIFER SIDA
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Jennifer Woo
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 41% · published
Jorge Chavez
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Lori DeLisser
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
MIGUEL ANGEL HERNANDEZ VAZQUEZ
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Nathan Brown
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Robert Hoy
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Roberto Diaz
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Selena Solis
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 34% · published
Vianka Sanchez
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 35% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roberto Diaz + Aram Trejo8752% gamesnot enough data
Selena Solis + Lori DeLisser1442% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Woo + Selena Solis404 matchesnot enough data
Vianka Sanchez + Aram Trejo213 matchesnot enough data
Lori DeLisser + MIGUEL ANGEL HERNANDEZ VAZQUEZ213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ismael Arellano Flores
21W–12L career · 17 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.91
Mike Caldarella
41W–40L career · 15 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Aram Trejo
29W–25L career · 23 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Beth Hoy
37W–12L career · 16 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.69
4
JENNIFER SIDA
27W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
Jennifer Woo
81W–101L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jorge Chavez
65W–35L career · 28 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lori DeLisser
94W–74L career · 23 lines in 2026
not enough data
MIGUEL ANGEL HERNANDEZ VAZQUEZ
12W–3L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nathan Brown
59W–32L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Robert Hoy
51W–41L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Roberto Diaz
24W–12L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Selena Solis
96W–102L career · 35 lines in 2026
not enough data
Vianka Sanchez
68W–51L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.