Teams

EHTC:Mixers:Bray/Lachack

2025 NCT Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 18 & Over Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-04vs FV:Sir Mixed-a-lot:Pérez/YaffeeLost 03
L#1 DoublesJohn Lachack / Janice Parla vs Cailyn Welsh / Kyle Testerman4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesWilken Mahland / Beth Lundy vs Elyse Post Perez / Tim Ligay0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBecky Freiberg / Clive Thomas vs Stephanie Monteith / Matthew Monteith0-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesNancy Bray / Thomas Donovan vs Sureshbabu Jothimani / Patria Disla4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Lachack / Pamela Moody vs Geoffrey McCallum / Adrienne Roach6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBeth Lundy / Wilken Mahland vs Paul Tetreault / Betty Anderson6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-04-06vs BTC:Tortured Tennis Dept:Griffith/Lost 03
L#1 DoublesThomas Donovan / Nancy Bray vs Eapen Mathew / Julie Piller4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Lachack / Pamela Moody vs Joshua Hester-Reyes / Veronica Grubin1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesClive Thomas / Angie Cheung vs Bruce Nash / Sharon Farber4-6, 2-6
2025-03-23vs FV:Sir Mixed-a-lot:Pérez/YaffeeLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Bray / Thomas Donovan vs Max Castrogiovanni / Elyse Post Perez4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Lachack / Pamela Moody vs Allison Yaffee / Ricardo Perez6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAngie Cheung / Allen Perry vs Breton Boudreaux / Samantha Lee3-6, 0-6
2025-03-16vs BTC:Tortured Tennis Dept:Griffith/Lost 12
L#1 DoublesThomas Donovan / Becky Freiberg vs Elizabeth Cushman / Eapen Mathew3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Lachack / Angie Cheung vs Genna Griffith / Antonio Valentin2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWilken Mahland / Beth Lundy vs Bruce Nash / Joni Harris2-6, 2-6
2025-03-09vs BTC:Tortured Tennis Dept:Griffith/Lost 02
L#1 DoublesNancy Bray / Thomas Donovan vs Genna Griffith / Joshua Hester-Reyes6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAngie Cheung / Wilken Mahland vs Brendan Moynihan / Lindsay Cao1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesThomas Donovan / Nancy Bray vs Panos Oikonomou / Vicki Oikonomou7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJohn Lachack / Angie Cheung vs Max Polakowski / Adrienne Roach4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesWilken Mahland / Beth Lundy vs Sureshbabu Jothimani / Betty Anderson5-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesNancy Bray / Thomas Donovan vs Suzanne Quaintance / Panos Oikonomou6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAngie Cheung / John Lachack vs Betty Anderson / Kevin Hebreo6-3, 6-2
2025-01-12vs FV:Sir Mixed-a-lot:Pérez/YaffeeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAngie Cheung / Wilken Mahland vs Morgan Castrogiovanni / Max Castrogiovanni7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJohn Lachack / Nancy Bray vs John Healey / Cailyn Welsh6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 18 & Over Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Wilken Mahland
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
John Lachack
usually #2 Doubles 88%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published
Allen Perry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Becky Freiberg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Nancy Bray
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.12
Pamela Moody
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Janice Parla
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Angie Cheung
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.75
Beth Lundy
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.68
Clive Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Thomas Donovan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angie Cheung + John Lachack4448% games−4.9% vs expected
Angie Cheung + Wilken Mahland71046% games−5.4% vs expected
Pamela Moody + John Lachack31143% games−8.2% vs expected
Clive Thomas + Angie Cheung0926% games−8.9% vs expected
Beth Lundy + Wilken Mahland31142% games−9.7% vs expected
Nancy Bray + John Lachack4840% games−12.6% vs expected
Clive Thomas + Nancy Bray3445% gamesnot enough data
Wilken Mahland + Nancy Bray3257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wilken Mahland
33W–48L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
John Lachack
67W–96L career · 8 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.28
3.5
Allen Perry
1W–3L career · type M · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Becky Freiberg
53W–87L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Nancy Bray
68W–112L career · 10 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
Pamela Moody
57W–97L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Janice Parla
18W–42L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
3
Angie Cheung
26W–75L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3.5
Beth Lundy
15W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
2.75
3
Clive Thomas
38W–132L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Thomas Donovan
10W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.