Teams

4.5 Team

2026 USTA Adult 18&over League - Abilene · 4.5 ladies

8 players · average NTRP 4.33 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-07-21vs Hellums TeamLost 04
L#1 SinglesJenna Vincent vs Christina Colwell4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesStorey Moore / Bailey Hoke vs Casey Chapa / Jill Simon2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMadison Salmon vs Brittany Skrobarcek3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRose Bristow / Kristen Gil vs Courtney Cramer / Caitlin Cramer1-6, 1-6
2026-07-21vs Hellums TeamLost 13
W#1 SinglesJenna Vincent vs Ashley Caperton5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMadison Salmon / Claire Smothermon vs Courtney Cramer / Caitlin Cramer2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesRose Bristow vs Christina Colwell1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesStorey Moore / Bailey Hoke vs Brittany Skrobarcek / Casey Chapa4-6, 2-6
2026-06-27vs Hellums TeamLost 13
W#1 DoublesMadison Salmon / Claire Smothermon vs Brittany Skrobarcek / Hayden Jordan6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesGracie Caperton vs Ashley Caperton2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRose Bristow / Kristen Gil vs Nancy Brown / Cali Hellums2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJenna Vincent vs Jill Simon4-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 ladies
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hellums Team30132566
24.5 Team0321328177

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Claire Smothermon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Gracie Caperton
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Jenna Vincent
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
4.07
Madison Salmon
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.90
Bailey Hoke
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.73
Kristen Gil
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.71
Storey Moore
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.59
Rose Bristow
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bailey Hoke + Storey Moore123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Claire Smothermon
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Gracie Caperton
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Jenna Vincent
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
4.24
Madison Salmon
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
4.07
4
Bailey Hoke
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.90
Kristen Gil
5W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
Storey Moore
11W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
Rose Bristow
1W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.