Hellums Team

2026 USTA Adult 18&over League - Abilene · 4.5 ladies

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Schedule3 played

2026-07-21vs 4.5 TeamWon 4–0

W#1 SinglesChristina Colwell vs Jenna Vincent6-4, 6-4

W#2 DoublesCasey Chapa / Jill Simon vs Storey Moore / Bailey Hoke6-2, 6-1

W#2 SinglesBrittany Skrobarcek vs Madison Salmon6-3, 6-0

W#3 DoublesCourtney Cramer / Caitlin Cramer vs Rose Bristow / Kristen Gil6-1, 6-1

2026-07-21vs 4.5 TeamWon 3–1

L#1 SinglesAshley Caperton vs Jenna Vincent7-5, 4-6, 0-1

W#2 DoublesCourtney Cramer / Caitlin Cramer vs Madison Salmon / Claire Smothermon6-2, 6-1

W#2 SinglesChristina Colwell vs Rose Bristow6-1, 6-1

W#3 DoublesBrittany Skrobarcek / Casey Chapa vs Storey Moore / Bailey Hoke6-4, 6-2

2026-06-27vs 4.5 TeamWon 3–1

L#1 DoublesBrittany Skrobarcek / Hayden Jordan vs Madison Salmon / Claire Smothermon4-6, 6-1, 0-1

W#1 SinglesAshley Caperton vs Gracie Caperton6-2, 6-3

W#2 DoublesNancy Brown / Cali Hellums vs Rose Bristow / Kristen Gil6-2, 6-1

W#2 SinglesJill Simon vs Jenna Vincent6-4, 5-7, 1-0

A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.

Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 ladies

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1Hellums Team	3	0	13	2	5	66
24.5 Team	0	3	2	13	28	177

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.20 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25

Brittany Skrobarcek

usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5

—

Ashley Caperton

usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5

—

Caitlin Cramer

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5

—

Cali Hellums

usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5

—

Casey Chapa

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5

—

Courtney Cramer

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5

4.14

Christina Colwell

usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5

—

Hayden Jordan

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published —

—

Jill Simon

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published —

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5

Brittany Skrobarcek

3W–5L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026

3%93%4%

4.25

4.5

Ashley Caperton

1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

4.5

Caitlin Cramer

2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

4.5

Cali Hellums

1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026

not enough data

—

4.5

Casey Chapa

2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

4.5

Courtney Cramer

2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

4.5

Christina Colwell

55W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026

16%83%<1%

4.14

—

Hayden Jordan

0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026

not enough data

—

Jill Simon

2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.