Teams

Bonita Bay - North

2024 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.43 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-02-22vs Quail West - SeeseLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristie Lehmann / Carol Turner vs Susan Tiano / Karen Vogelzang6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-02-08vs Bonita National - S. FlaggLost 01
L#3 DoublesRenee Archambo / Christie Lehmann vs Terri Higgins / Kathy Bagnuolo2-6, 3-6
2024-02-01Won 10
W#3 DoublesChristie Lehmann / Kristine Mauro vs Debbie Miller / Faith Apt6-3, 7-6
2024-01-25vs Village Walk Bonita - LaggisLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnn McManus / Christie Lehmann vs Ann Kremer / Joan Ravens3-6, 2-6
2024-01-18vs Lighthouse Bay - CoteWon 20
W#1 DoublesCheryl Ingram / Kim Stencel vs Mary Curry / Anna Lis6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnn McManus / Christie Lehmann vs Mary Fries / Jane Riutta6-1, 6-4
2024-01-17vs Valencia Bonita - L. SteuererWon 10
W#1 DoublesCheryl Ingram / Kim Stencel vs Lorraine Steuerer / Sue Capps6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Cheryl Ingram
published 3.5
3.33
Gail Morley
published 3.5
3.31
Kim Stencel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Ann McManus
published 3.5
Barb Morton
published 3.5
3.24
Heidi Nettler
published 3.5
2.86
Christie Lehmann
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Joanne Graceman
published
Kristine Mauro
published
Renee Archambo
published
Susan Dunsirn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Dunsirn + Kim Stencel4448% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cheryl Ingram
116W–69L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Gail Morley
13W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Kim Stencel
33W–47L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Ann McManus
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Barb Morton
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Heidi Nettler
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.24
3
Christie Lehmann
17W–53L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
2.86
Joanne Graceman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kristine Mauro
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Renee Archambo
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Dunsirn
16W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.