Teams

Quail West - Seese

2024 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.42 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-02-29vs Bonita National - S. FlaggLost 01
L#3 DoublesCarla Sancin / Karen Dunbar vs Jane Mills / Diane Mancini6-7, 5-7
2024-02-22Won 10
W#3 DoublesSusan Tiano / Karen Vogelzang vs Christie Lehmann / Carol Turner3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-02-15vs Valencia Bonita - L. SteuererLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Dunbar / Ellen Kaplan vs Diane Johnston / Valerie Barrett6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Dunbar / Tricia Blakeslee vs Margie Minkler / Katrina Tiedge5-7, 2-6
2024-02-01vs Bonita National - S. FlaggWon 10
W#3 DoublesKaren Vogelzang / Coquette Fluharty vs Kathy Bagnuolo / Susan Lindberg7-6, 6-4
2024-01-25vs Pelican Landing - D'OlimpioWon 10
W#1 DoublesTricia Blakeslee / Karen Dunbar vs Karen Leenheers / Rebecca Matarazzi6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Doreen Clappin
published
3.32
Michelle Minor
published
3.27
Carla Sancin
published 3.5
Ada Kimmel
published 3.5
3.16
Aster Leitner
published 3.5
3.15
Coquette Fluharty
published 3.5
3.10
Cindy Benike
published 3.5
Christine Seese
published 3
Ellen Kaplan
published
Ginny Asgeirsson
published
Karen Dunbar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Karen Vogelzang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Tiano
published
Tricia Blakeslee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Minor + Doreen Clappin4356% games−0.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Doreen Clappin
59W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
Michelle Minor
19W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Carla Sancin
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Ada Kimmel
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Aster Leitner
2W–12L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Coquette Fluharty
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Cindy Benike
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
23%76%<1%
3.10
3
Christine Seese
14W–35L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ellen Kaplan
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ginny Asgeirsson
7W–16L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen Dunbar
38W–76L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen Vogelzang
27W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Tiano
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tricia Blakeslee
24W–90L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.