Teams

Flight Z Winners / Audubon Country Club

2024 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-02-29vs Lighthouse Bay - CoteWon 20
W#1 DoublesMary Huber-Olk / Alexandra Thorne vs Anna Lis / Donna Goldsmith6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKatrina Tiedge / Margie Minkler vs Patricia DiBernardo / DonaVee Cote4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-02-22vs Lighthouse Bay - CoteSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary Huber-Olk / Nan Jeffrey vs Anna Lis / Cheryl Gibson6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPam Davis / Katrina Tiedge vs Patricia DiBernardo / Donna Goldsmith4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-02-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Huber-Olk / Pam Davis vs Cheryl Ingram / Carol Turner0-6, 2-6
2024-02-08vs Quail West - SeeseWon 10
W#2 DoublesMargie Minkler / Katrina Tiedge vs Karen Dunbar / Tricia Blakeslee7-5, 6-2
2024-02-01vs Valencia Bonita - L. SteuererWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Huber-Olk / Nan Jeffrey vs Lorraine Steuerer / Kate Gredinger6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-01-25vs Bonita National - S. FlaggSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary Huber-Olk / Nan Jeffrey vs Mary-Anne Topulos / Susan Lindberg6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGail Lockyer / Katrina Tiedge vs Terri Higgins / Teresa Regelmann1-6, 2-6
2024-01-23vs Village Walk Bonita - LaggisWon 20
W#1 DoublesMary Huber-Olk / Gail Lockyer vs Joan Ravens / Ann Kremer6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDebbie Lackey / Katrina Tiedge vs Marcia Kenyon / Margaret Laggis7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2024-01-18vs Pelican Landing - D'OlimpioWon 20
W#1 DoublesMary Huber-Olk / Alexandra Thorne vs Ellen Davis / PAMELA ARBOGAST4-2
W#3 DoublesDebbie Lackey / Katrina Tiedge vs Francine D'Olimpio / Valerie Stavro7-6, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Mary Huber-Olk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Denise Quinn
published 3.5
3.25
Alexandra Thorne
published 3.5
3.11
Pam Davis
published
2.85
Debbie Lackey
published 3
Gail Lockyer
published
Karen Angelis
published
Katrina Tiedge
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Margie Minkler
published
Michele Young
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katrina Tiedge + Mary Huber-Olk4261% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mary Huber-Olk
127W–49L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%19%81%
3.62
3.5
Denise Quinn
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Alexandra Thorne
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.25
Pam Davis
2W–20L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
3
Debbie Lackey
27W–31L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
2.85
Gail Lockyer
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen Angelis
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Katrina Tiedge
45W–29L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Margie Minkler
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michele Young
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.