Teams

HFII BLUE

2023 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO

7 players · average NTRP 3.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-04-29vs LTFC BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesKristi Piazza / Julie Garside vs Colleen Frank / Cristina Denezza3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesDiane Vartuli vs Erin Conley2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDNita Andrews / Joy Coulter-Brown vs Joy Herrin / Melissa Louie3-6, 2-6
2023-04-22vs CACI BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesJulie Garside / Diane Vartuli vs Holly Kortum / Cherie Weaver6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDNita Andrews / Maria Matney vs Mary Candee / Angela Rose6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-15vs PCRK BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesSandra Stephenson / Maria Matney vs Janelle Williams / Jane Hetherington7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoy Coulter-Brown / Diane Vartuli vs Mary Ingolia / Julie Whipple1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-04-08vs WC BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesJoy Coulter-Brown / Maria Matney vs Melissa Klein / Jamelle Leyden5-7, 2-6
2023-04-01vs HRCA-N REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristi Piazza / Sandra Stephenson vs Courtney Carignan / Jordana Sutphin7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDiane Vartuli / Joy Coulter-Brown vs Susana Wanken / Debra Etzel4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Julie Garside
published
3.83
Sandra Stephenson
published
3.80
Diane Vartuli
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.75
Maria Matney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
DNita Andrews
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Kristi Piazza
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.33
Joy Coulter-Brown
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristi Piazza + DNita Andrews5251% games+8.8% vs expected
Diane Vartuli + Kristi Piazza11556% games−3.1% vs expected
Kristi Piazza + Sandra Stephenson4158% gamesnot enough data
Diane Vartuli + Joy Coulter-Brown314 matchesnot enough data
Diane Vartuli + Sandra Stephenson314 matchesnot enough data
Diane Vartuli + DNita Andrews213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Garside
27W–25L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.86
Sandra Stephenson
31W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Diane Vartuli
78W–53L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Maria Matney
39W–28L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
4
DNita Andrews
23W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Kristi Piazza
61W–66L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Joy Coulter-Brown
86W–77L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%88%12%
3.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.