Teams

WC BLUE

2023 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO

7 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-04-29vs VCC REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRobin Carroll / Kate Mayoss vs Kristen Adams / Melissa Blake2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesStacy Burd / Jamelle Leyden vs Karmen Davis / Christine Aberle6-2, 6-4
2023-04-22vs GAC REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesStacy Burd / Jamelle Leyden vs Carol Thornock / Jan McCaffrey6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMelissa Klein / Ashley Agrelius vs Ruth McIntyre / Lana Pierce6-4, 6-2
2023-04-15vs LTFC BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesKate Mayoss / Ashley Agrelius vs Natalia Isabel Camera Perez / Joy Herrin2-6, 2-6
2023-04-08vs HFII BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesKate Mayoss / Margaret Wilson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMelissa Klein / Jamelle Leyden vs Joy Coulter-Brown / Maria Matney7-5, 6-2
2023-04-01vs PCRK BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesKate Mayoss / Ashley Agrelius vs Annie Ross / Jane Hetherington7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJamelle Leyden vs Janelle Williams1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Margaret Wilson
published
3.78
Kate Mayoss
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Jamelle Leyden
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.68
Melissa Klein
published
3.67
Stacy Burd
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.52
Robin Carroll
published
3.46
Ashley Agrelius
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamelle Leyden + Kate Mayoss18955% games+5.4% vs expected
Ashley Agrelius + Kate Mayoss101447% games+1.9% vs expected
Melissa Klein + Kate Mayoss3453% games+0.7% vs expected
Stacy Burd + Jamelle Leyden332453% games−2.7% vs expected
Jamelle Leyden + Melissa Klein303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Wilson
26W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Kate Mayoss
111W–105L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Jamelle Leyden
95W–63L career · 4 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.70
Melissa Klein
16W–19L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Stacy Burd
49W–40L career · 2 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.67
Robin Carroll
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
43%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Ashley Agrelius
92W–138L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.