Teams

Court Cases

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - POCATELLO · Women 3.5 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.17 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-30vs Racquet RockstarsSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCarrie Rose Lindley / Allyson Laible vs Lyndsi Whitworth / Rachel Mattson2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMelissa Suru vs Kirsten Nickisch6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMichele Surmelis / Lorie Murray vs Melissa Brake / Heather Farnsworth4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesVenita Petti / Victoria Scharp vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-29vs Racquet RockstarsSplit 22
L#1 DoublesChristine Paulsen / Lorie Murray vs Mikel Harmon / Melissa Brake1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKaren Dickerson vs Heather Farnsworth3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAllyson Laible / Michele Surmelis vs Heather McGeehan / Kim Hickey1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnita Gibson / Panayota Semons-Short vs Quincy Sutton / Teresa Henderson6-7, 3-6
2024-07-22vs Racquet RockstarsLost 13
L#1 DoublesChristine Paulsen / Lorie Murray vs Lyndsi Whitworth / Melissa Brake2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKaren Dickerson vs Heather Farnsworth6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesCarrie Rose Lindley / Allyson Laible vs Mikel Harmon / Kim Hickey4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCami Ellis / Victoria Scharp vs Teresa Henderson / Quincy Sutton3-6, 0-6
2024-07-17vs Racquet RockstarsSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLorie Murray / Christine Paulsen vs Quincy Sutton / Melissa Brake2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMelissa Suru vs Heather Farnsworth6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesVenita Petti / Allyson Laible vs Rachel Mattson / Lyndsi Whitworth4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAnita Gibson / Panayota Semons-Short vs Teresa Henderson / Kirsten Nickisch6-3, 6-4
2024-07-16vs Racquet RockstarsLost 04
L#1 DoublesLorie Murray / Allyson Laible vs Rachel Mattson / Lyndsi Whitworth1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMelissa Suru vs Kirsten Nickisch2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarrie Rose Lindley / Michele Surmelis vs Melissa Brake / Quincy Sutton1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCami Ellis / Victoria Scharp vs Heather McGeehan / Teresa Henderson0-6, 0-6
2024-07-09vs Racquet RockstarsLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarrie Rose Lindley / Michele Surmelis vs Heather McGeehan / Quincy Sutton1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMelissa Suru vs Kim Hickey6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAnita Gibson / Cami Ellis vs Rachel Mattson / Kirsten Nickisch2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 3.5 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Racquet Rockstars5116818166
2Court Cases1581634239

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Allyson Laible
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.22
Melissa Suru
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Anita Gibson
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
3.07
Michele Surmelis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.05
Christine Paulsen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Carrie Rose Lindley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.00
Karen Dickerson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Cami Ellis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Lorie Murray
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.78
Panayota Semons-Short
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.71
Victoria Scharp
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.69
Venita Petti
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anita Gibson + Venita Petti4162% games+14.8% vs expected
Anita Gibson + Panayota Semons-Short3253% games+14.8% vs expected
Michele Surmelis + Victoria Scharp4457% games+12.9% vs expected
Anita Gibson + Victoria Scharp11855% games+6.0% vs expected
Victoria Scharp + Cami Ellis2643% games+3.0% vs expected
Lorie Murray + Christine Paulsen4350% games+1.4% vs expected
Michele Surmelis + Carrie Rose Lindley3940% games−0.9% vs expected
Venita Petti + Carrie Rose Lindley8650% games−1.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Allyson Laible
24W–37L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Melissa Suru
122W–86L career · 7 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.22
3
Anita Gibson
146W–134L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%16%84%
3.13
3
Michele Surmelis
240W–166L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.07
3.5
Christine Paulsen
60W–73L career · 3 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.05
3
Carrie Rose Lindley
73W–100L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.04
3.5
Karen Dickerson
66W–44L career · 2 lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Cami Ellis
95W–106L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Lorie Murray
51W–83L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Panayota Semons-Short
104W–117L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Victoria Scharp
101W–160L career · 5 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Venita Petti
82W–116L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.