Teams

Odegaard/Nichols

2026 IA 65 & Over Adult League · 7.0 65 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / IOWA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-05-17vs IA/Smith-Mahoski/65&Over7.0MLost 12
W#1 DoublesDana Nichols / Wesley Brackey vs Daniel Ellard / Scott Teasdale7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGary Wendel / Steven Odegaard vs Christopher Bryant / Charles Mahoski2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRANDY RICHARDS / Kevin Williams vs Kevin Nebergall / John Stierman7-5, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 65 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IA/Smith-Mahoski/65&Over7.0M1021328
2Odegaard/Nichols0112537

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Kevin Williams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Steven Odegaard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Dana Nichols
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.81
RANDY RICHARDS
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Gary Wendel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Wesley Brackey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kevin Williams
20W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.53
Steven Odegaard
7W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Dana Nichols
13W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
61%39%<1%
2.96
RANDY RICHARDS
5W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
91%9%<1%
2.81
Gary Wendel
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Wesley Brackey
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.