Teams

Cl.Owens18A

2025 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-18Split 11
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Faust / Sharon Fred vs Stephanie Gillespie / Melissa Thomas2-3
L#1 SinglesSandra Truitt vs Jennifer Martin7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-27vs St.Gupton18AWon 20
W#1 DoublesClaire Owens / Sharon Fred vs Morgan Haskins / Katherine Kleisch7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLauren Hiller / Courtney Hodgson vs Kristin Baddour / Mary Ellen Crawley6-2, 6-2
2025-04-06vs Je.VanCampen18AWon 21
W#1 SinglesErika Peterson vs Merab Puleo6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesSandra Truitt vs Josette Huntress1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLauren Hiller / Sarah Cooke vs Terri Bartucca / Tina Dahir3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-03-30vs In.NavarroGalisteo18AWon 20
W#1 SinglesErika Peterson vs Elie Foy6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesSandra Truitt vs Dana Aderhold6-3, 6-0
2025-03-27vs Su.Braga18ASplit 11
W#2 SinglesSandra Truitt vs Kathryn White7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLauren Hiller / Lauren Daigle vs Jill Orr / Lindsay Bass2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-03-23vs Be.Pegram18AWon 20
W#1 DoublesClaire Owens / Sharon Fred vs Holly Gyovai / Kimberlie Meeker6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesErika Peterson vs Cara Garrett6-0, 6-1
2025-03-09vs Na.Rodriguez18ALost 02
L#1 SinglesSandra Truitt vs Caroline Margolis6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDiana Kennedy / Lauren Hiller vs Taylor Meyer / Sara Walker4-6, 4-6
2025-03-02vs Br.Humphrey18ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesTami Hollingsworth / Sharon Fred vs Brittany Humphrey / Juliana Treleven6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSandra Truitt vs Carrie Patrick6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Erika Peterson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.05
Sandra Truitt
usually #1 Singles 55%, also #2 Singles 36% · published 3
2.96
Kendall Stevens
published
2.90
Sharon Fred
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.89
Courtney Hodgson
published 3
2.87
Elizabeth Faust
published 3
2.83
Lauren Daigle
published
2.82
Lauren Hiller
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.75
Tami Hollingsworth
published
2.51
Sarah Cooke
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Erika Peterson
75W–29L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
3
Sandra Truitt
37W–76L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
Kendall Stevens
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.96
3
Sharon Fred
151W–155L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Courtney Hodgson
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Elizabeth Faust
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
Lauren Daigle
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Lauren Hiller
34W–44L career · 10 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
Tami Hollingsworth
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Sarah Cooke
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.