Teams

WP YELLOW

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 3.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-03vs CP REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesTony Gubenko / Nick Brown vs Roland Eckenhausen / Michael Evans6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChris Carry vs Alan Caffey6-2, 6-2
2024-08-27vs SKY BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesChris Carry / Michael MacHado vs Ryan Goodale / Brian Dwyer6-2, 6-3
2024-08-20vs CACM REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesTony Gubenko / Chris Carry vs Charles Greenhouse / Jay Rael3-6, 2-6
2024-08-17vs GPTC REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesChris Carry / Michael MacHado vs David Junta / Tommy Phillips7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTony Gubenko / Jack FitzGerrell vs Kyungsoo Jeong / Viktor Bojilov6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-08-06vs CM REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChris Carry / Michael MacHado vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBrian Fitzgerrell / Zuben Bastani vs Michael Pardun / Paul Weissman5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2024-08-01vs SKY GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael MacHado / Chris Carry vs Evan Dechtman / Jeff Hutcheson7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesTony Gubenko / Nick Brown vs David Garrison / Scott Hermansen6-3, 6-1
2024-07-30vs CP BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesTony Gubenko / Nick Brown vs Jeff Walters / Peter Horsch7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrian Fitzgerrell / Jack FitzGerrell vs Troy Kilen / Edmond Barbe4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Brandon Paxton
published 4
3.51
Chris Carry
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.51
Nick Brown
published
3.36
Brian Fitzgerrell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Tony Gubenko
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.18
Zuben Bastani
published
Jack FitzGerrell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Fitzgerrell + Tony Gubenko7455% games+1.0% vs expected
Tony Gubenko + Chris Carry11357% games+0.8% vs expected
Brian Fitzgerrell + Jack FitzGerrell303 matchesnot enough data
Brian Fitzgerrell + Zuben Bastani123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brandon Paxton
21W–19L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
3.5
Chris Carry
69W–19L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.51
Nick Brown
17W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Brian Fitzgerrell
78W–37L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Tony Gubenko
105W–69L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.26
Zuben Bastani
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Jack FitzGerrell
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.